TURNING the clocks back each winter increases Britain's greenhouse gas emissions and adds millions of pounds to power bills, according to a new study.
Cambridge University researchers estimate that darker evenings cause domestic consumers to use 2% more electricity, generating millions of tons of carbon dioxide.
Elizabeth Garnsey, one of the authors, and a Reader in engineering and business at the university's Institute for Manufacturing, said the study anticipated next weekend's turning back of the clocks one hour from British Summer Time (BST) to Greenwich Mean Time (GMT).
Under GMT, around 35% of the population are asleep when the sun rises in winter and so make no use of the extra daylight, she said.
When they come home from school or work in cold and darkness, they cause a surge in demand.
"Britain can only meet these daily surges by switching on less efficient back-up generating plants such as oil-fired power stations.
"We estimate that pushes up costs to 5% more than it otherwise would be."
Emissions
Dr Garnsey said: "Our current time policy costs us dearly in bills and carbon dioxide emissions.
"Setting the clocks back to GMT is an institutional practice so well entrenched it is exempt from evidence-based policy making. No systematic evidence has been produced and no research commissioned in support of the Government's position."
The report says that from 2001 to 2006 a 2% increase in average daily electricity consumption is estimated to have occurred during GMT months, over and above expected consumption if the clocks had not gone back.
Reckoned cumulatively since the re-imposition of GMT after a three year trial in 1971, being on GMT+1 in winter could have supplied the population of Greater London with electricity for two years at current consumption rates, it says.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 20 and replies | View All
alvinlwh (22/10/2007 at 12:34)
AH, Manchester (22/10/2007 at 14:12)
Mandy Davies (22/10/2007 at 16:11)
PW, Manchester (22/10/2007 at 18:56)
As for the clocks going back, it should be left alone. It favours Scottish farmers - in a region that increasingly wants its own autonomy. Well, surely they can also have their own time zones? They now get free prescriptions over the border, and we have to have our autumn evenings pitch-black to suit their purposes. No offence to Scots. I love them, but this situation is not fair to us English.
S P In exile, Tameside (23/10/2007 at 02:09)
Why should we go on helping the Scots when they obviously don't like the English so let them have GMT and we can stick with BST.
Mandy Davies (23/10/2007 at 12:56)
polkyb (25/10/2007 at 08:21)
MAN MADE CLIMATE CHANGE IS A MYTH!
NASA have proof that Mars, Pluto and Jupiter are also suffering from global warming at approximately the same rate as the Earth, caused by a warm period of the SUN.
So, please, tell me how my CO2 emissions can possibly affect another planet?
The whole carbon footprint thing is a con to make money out of thin air and you are all lapping it up!
Besides, CO2 is WAY down the list of nasty greenhouse gasses... way behind the likes of methane and even water vapour.
In 2020, the sun is predicted to enter a cooler phase than it's currently in, which will cause global cooling. Who else bets that the politicians pat themselves on the back for averting the "Disaster".
Black Sabbath (25/10/2007 at 09:56)
polkyb (25/10/2007 at 10:16)
As the sun heats the seas, CO2 and water vapour are released into the atmosphere.
Man is responsible for the tinyest fraction of the total CO2 being released when compared to the sea.
Another interesting fact for you; Last year the total CO2 created by all aircraft all over the world was around HALF that produced by all the ships/boats on the seas.
So why no tax on them?
Mandy Davies (25/10/2007 at 12:11)
Speaking Bull, East Tepee (25/10/2007 at 12:27)
polkyb (25/10/2007 at 12:34)
Please don’t believe just me. Here are some links to some SCIENTIFIC sites which are stating that global warming would happen whether humans were contributing or not.
Lets start with Martian global warming
www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?ArtId=17977
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
now a bit about Solar warming
www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2006/03/21/solar-warming/
earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/MediaAlerts/2005/2005100320576.html
www.livescience.com/environment/070312_solarsys_warming.html
You may note that some of these stories are quite old. Sorry. The less gullible amongst us have know it was a con for years.
I am NOT saying that global warming doesn’t exist.
I *AM* saying that Human intervention will NOT change the warming period we’re going through now (I even suggest that we couldn’t even if we tried).
If you read up on it, instead of believing every word you hear in the media (and from scientists on hefty government grants) you would form you own opinion as well.
Evidence (real historical evidence) shows that CO2 content in the atmosphere FOLLOWS the change in temperature and has never (some say COULD never) lead it.
Black Sabbath (25/10/2007 at 14:30)
Peer review is meaningless, it's like having Tony Blair review the next Labour manifesto and declaring it to be the best manifesto.
All of the IPCC are in the pay of the UN who in turn is funded by governments who, of course, have NO interest in punitive taxation disguised as GREEN taxation do they?
Oh, of course not.
polkyb (25/10/2007 at 15:52)
If anything is done to stop clocks going forwards and backwards, we should get rid of BST (or GMT+1).
Be proud of our herritage and stop whinging because "It's Dark"
If the energy suppliers haven't yet sorted out enough green (ie. Nuclear) power stations, then that's their problem.
Mandy Davies (25/10/2007 at 16:18)
Mandy Davies (25/10/2007 at 16:41)
Black Sabbath (25/10/2007 at 18:29)
Read this to see who these 'peers' you are so fond of really are.
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/05/nosplit/nwarm05.xml
BluePolarBear, ex of Stockport (26/10/2007 at 21:39)
Mandy Davies (27/10/2007 at 12:51)
Bob Arrandale (29/10/2007 at 16:48)
The argument has started as it does every year at this time about the clocks going back but nobody ever seems to put the alternative view.
People seem to think that by keeping BST throughout the year the sun will shine for an extra hour, but you cannot change the earth’s rotation whatever you do with the clocks. The sun will rise and fall as it has for millennia, changing with the seasons.
Clocks are a man made invention largely in Britain especially in Greenwich, which is why we have GMT, the zero point to which all world time zones are referenced. GMT being the reference is the time in Greenwich, London in wintertime. BST came along later as a way of getting extra evening sunlight in the summer.
If anything is going to be changed it is BST that should be scrapped and GMT kept throughout the year as the world standard that it is. If this causes problems with children going home in the dark etc. then start school earlier and finish earlier and if other groups are affected apply it to them also. We all have the choice to get up at a time to suit our personal lives.
Greenwich Mean Time is there for a reason, it is when the sun is directly overhead at 12 noon, and this is the correct time zone for England. Other countries shift their clocks by 1 hour or more as you move progressively East or West to match the time of day at 12 noon when the sun is overhead. With Europe spreading eastwards you cannot have a situation where it is the same time in Turkey as it is in London, so why go to Central European Time.
Keep GMT throughout the year and be proud that we gave the world its time system.