THERE'S nothing like a bright idea to save money . . . and on the face of it, dimming street lamps sounds nothing like a bright idea.
But council chiefs have been told they could save an estimated £7,000 a year if just 1,000 street lights did not operate at full power.
And Tameside has no fewer than 25,000 of them across the borough.
The authority's energy panel, chaired by council leader Roy Oldham, hopes to make savings because of reduced maintenance and lower energy costs thanks to new hi-tech lighting.
Tameside was the first council in the country to install the latest `lanterns' with electronic control gear, and previously they have operated at full capacity.
The new lights are said to be easier to monitor online and the idea of dimming them was first tested on the `Royals' estate off Yew Tree Lane in Dukinfield.
There were problems due to difficulties adjusting the lighting levels, but for some months now, 1,000 street lights in areas such as Ashton, Dukinfield and Denton have been operating below full capacity.
Questionnaires have been sent to homes and the feedback is now being analysed for the energy panel.
A `risk management' report is also looking at public safety issues.
The Living Streets charity said good lighting is essential to reduce crime and the fear of crime - and Coun John Bell, leader of Tameside's Conservative group, said: "I understand the need to seek value for money, but you have guard against issues such as community safety. I would not like to see crime soar - it is absolutely imperative we have good street lighting."
The council's Paul Jennings said: "It is critical that we do not drop the lighting levels and most people probably will not notice the difference. So far, we have had one complaint - from someone who said the light no longer lights up his garden, which he liked."
The lights are operating at 90 per cent capacity for the experiment, which the council said is `well within the parameters of energy reduction'.
Tweet
Dim street lights to save cash
September 07, 2007
Dim street lighting on Saint Albans Avenue, Ashton Under Lyne.

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
marc (07/09/2007 at 08:25)
idiots. dukinfield is the worst place in tamside for crime.
Guv, Manchester (07/09/2007 at 08:34)
Blue Chris, On The Blue Moon (07/09/2007 at 09:00)
Absolute joke !!
How about they stop wasting their money on Speed Bumps that serve no purpose other than to wreck cars and create noise !!??
Rimsky (07/09/2007 at 09:16)
Lisa Moore...Wilmslow...Cheshire (07/09/2007 at 11:10)
ace, manchester (07/09/2007 at 12:29)
The Catcher, In the Rye (07/09/2007 at 12:45)
The Catcher, In the Rye (07/09/2007 at 12:51)
come-on-city (07/09/2007 at 13:18)
ace, manchester (07/09/2007 at 13:31)
I was just talking about lighting mate.no going backward with law and order .I really wish we could go back to the birch and the death sentence .to stop these monsters killing people.etc
Joey, Ashton under Lyne, (07/09/2007 at 13:44)
PLEASE DO, It beats anything I have read recently
ace, manchester (07/09/2007 at 15:04)
I would turn the clocks back to morrow if i thought that i could stop all these politicians that have ruined britain being born.
come-on-city (07/09/2007 at 15:36)
For example TB as population control?
Mrs. T, Other side of the canal (07/09/2007 at 15:41)
Lisa Moore...Wilmslow...Cheshire
7/09/2007 at 11:10
Please can you tell me what mind blowing medication you are taking? It's not working. You seem to have it in for the 'poor' why is this? I'm sure most of us on here don't all live the best of areas nor were bought up in them. Are you related to Dave Cameron? He wanted to hug a hoodie, you seem to want to sit them down with tea and biscuits and chat to them about their problems.
Ace for Prime Minister.
Andrew, Manchester (07/09/2007 at 15:44)
ace, manchester (07/09/2007 at 17:10)
Look at the problem from the other side.if cheshire and surounding areas are crime free they dont need lights so lets turn off the street lights in cheshire..
Mrs. T, Other side of the canal (07/09/2007 at 17:27)
Pippa, Manchester (07/09/2007 at 21:16)
Gray (07/09/2007 at 21:20)
Please identify these "studies" because I believe that perhaps you are unable to do so. This text has all the substance of the September Dossier. If however you refer to HORS 251 then I can certainly ignore your comment. Do not believe myth. It will do you no good and certainly does you no credit. Gray.
come-on-city (08/09/2007 at 13:05)
" A Home Office study found that street lighting improvements could cut crime by 20%. Indeed, with the Home Office itself acknowledging that improved lighting is four times better at reducing crime than CCTV, it seems that the huge sums of money spent on televising and recording our streets would have been better spent lighting them instead. "
From Tom Franklin, Living Streets Chief Executive, in the Central Government Public Service Review, Issue 11.
Also I beleive public fear of crime is reduced with better street lighting, rather than a dark street and CCTV camera.
Joey, Ashton under Lyne, (08/09/2007 at 15:08)
Pippa,
Just ring the council - there is a fixed penalty charge for playing "Ball Games" in the street. The fifty quid that the council gets of each player in extra revenuse will pay for the electricity.
ace, manchester (08/09/2007 at 15:51)
Hi mate your joking we have a great football field and park just yards away from where i live and guess what all the kids play football across the roads,rather than walk a few yards and we have CCTV and wardens that are totally useless .like ive said we have lots of laws but we dont enforce them....welcome to the british way.
Joey, Ashton under Lyne, (08/09/2007 at 17:36)
I live opposite a "pocket park" where people do what they want even into the small hours - the cctv camera is in the park - but no one will be watching.
Here are the statutes that are relevent:
The Highways Act 1980 s161(3) states that "if a person plays at football or any other game on a highway to the annoyance of a user of the highway he is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine.
Noise is under section 82 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.
Wheelie bins blocking your pavement and being used as cricket wickets etc can be either the 1980 Highways Act or the 2005 Clean Neighbourhood and Environmental Act.
ace, manchester (08/09/2007 at 18:42)
Im in full agreement with you mate i just wonder why have the councils spent all those tens of thousands of pounds on CCTV ? they dont really do anything .only give the councillors a pat on the back when they were first installed.
Pippa, Manchester (09/09/2007 at 17:05)