THE parents of two graffiti vandals jailed for causing thousands of pounds of damage on the railways are planning to appeal against their sentences.
Thomas Whittaker, 18, was sentenced to 12 months behind bars and Thomas `TJ' Dolan, 20, was jailed for 15 months on Tuesday when they appeared at Manchester Crown Court for causing around £13,000 worth of damage by spray-painting railway property across the North West.
Their devastated parents have now spoken out about the decision to jail the duo, calling them `talented artists' who `did not deserve to go to prison'.
They are planning to appeal against the severity of the sentences.
Whittaker, of Brocklehurst Avenue, Macclesfield, was jailed for 12 months. His parents Denise Whittaker, 40, and step dad Neil Buttery, 41, revealed he was due to start an art degree at university in just a few weeks time.
Denise said: "It is heartbreaking. I've had to cancel everything - he was due to start his graphic art degree at Liverpool John Moores in a few weeks and had it all sorted.
"I was really proud that he got a place at university, especially because he had to sit before a panel and explain to them he was awaiting trial, but they gave him a place anyway."
She added: "He knows he has done wrong but the sentence is very severe.
"They are not thugs they are intelligent people who would not harm anyone.
"Both sets of parents are by no means ashamed by what they have done.
"Tom wants to try and carry on with his art in prison and has asked me to find out whether there will be any courses he can do to keep up his skills while he's there."
Neil added: "We understand that they have done wrong and they are not blameless but the punishment should fit the crime.
Proportion
"You can get drunk and beat someone up and get an £80 fine, which shows how out of proportion the sentences are. They've not physically harmed anyone.
"This was Tom's first offence but they waited until the week after he turned 18 to arrest him and then put him through an adult trial and sent him to jail."
Dolan's parents, Tommy and Judy, of Leek Road, struggled to comprehend the 15-month sentence imposed on their son, who holds urban art workshops to help underprivileged children and was praised by the mayor of Manchester for his artwork.
Father-of-four Tommy fought back tears as he talked of his son's artistic abilities.
He said: "Everyone is just so shocked by the verdict, it seems so unfair. The work TJ does is amazing. He had only just come back from Dublin, where they paid for him to go and take part in an arts festival.
"People say that one day he will be famous. When he was asked to graffiti a model of a cow in Manchester for a festival, even the mayor told him that he was incredibly talented.
"My worry was always that the judge was going to make an example of them but these boys aren't criminals, they have never done anything else wrong."
Dolan also worked with underprivileged children in Manchester, holding urban art workshops to help youngsters build confidence
Tommy added: "TJ was just working with kids in Moss Side last week, some who were electronically tagged and only 11 or 12. I don't want to sound dramatic, but what are they going to do without TJ?"
"They are both so sorry about what they have done. But these are good kids, everybody loves them, they don't deserve to go to prison. People say that going to prison doesn't affect a strong person, but for a weaker person, it can break them."
Denise added: "Tom and TJ wouldn't harm a fly, they just love their art."
Whittaker, also a budding artist, had recently completed a BTEC diploma in graphic design at Macclesfield College, where he was praised by his tutors for his promising ability.
What do you think? Have your say.
Tweet
Jailed graffiti pair to appeal
September 01, 2007
Thomas 'TJ' Dolan arriving at court

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
gladys rowbotham, Manchester (01/09/2007 at 08:45)
Come on you "parents" - stump up! Where do you think your kids were going at all hours of the night with their cans of paint?
janetj235, chorlton (01/09/2007 at 08:47)
David, Manchester (01/09/2007 at 09:41)
ace, manchester (01/09/2007 at 10:02)
selfexiled (01/09/2007 at 10:07)
Saint, Middleton (01/09/2007 at 10:21)
joanna kay (01/09/2007 at 12:15)
jsac1984 (01/09/2007 at 12:27)
They have been sentenced for causing thousands of pounds worth of damage to property that ISNT and never will be theirs . I hope the appeal court give them a longer sentence!
FREE MERS FREE KREK, Macclesfield (01/09/2007 at 12:57)
Artistic Injustice!!!!! (01/09/2007 at 13:19)
Graffiti is an art form that has been around for year's, why shud these two ARTISTS be punnished for creating art for all to see, we shud be praising them and pushing them in the right direction.
Peace to whit and TJ much love, you have my support.
Pippa, Manchester (01/09/2007 at 13:26)
I LOVE NQ, City Centre (01/09/2007 at 13:28)
info@belinurbanart.com
Doubledee, Manchester (01/09/2007 at 14:03)
Look at the picture of TJ...He is currently walking around with people who have been sentenced to life for MURDER!!!...are you seriously gonna tell me that is justice?
If the answer to that question is "yes"? then you're head really is warped!!
They tried to ban rock 'n' roll back in the 50's claiming it was devil music and that it would only bring an end to social economics and rot the generation that followed???... Can you imagine where we'd be if they'd jailed the beatles???
GO to this site: www.myspace/hellokreky
See for yourself, they don't deserve to be in prison!!!!
There is a support group being formed on facebook called "free kreky"....if you want the appeal to succeed GET INVOLVED!!!
With enough support we can have a voice!!
WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE FOR THESE TWO KIDS!!!...DO IT NOW!!!!!
freedom of speech (01/09/2007 at 14:09)
My view is that the lads have done wrong.I think taking all the factors written by friends and the papers etc into consideration and my view is that a suspended sentence may have been more appropriate. However I have to strongly disagree with those who think that painting private property or trains or whatever is simply art and why should one be punished for it.If I threw a stone at a house window I would consider it to be criminal damage and would expect to be punished accordingly . Likewise if I took a sledgehammer to a car then that too would be criminal damage. But why oh why is it apparently 'ok' for someone to spray other peoples property regardless of who owns it against their wishes and without their consent. IT IS NOT !
Both graffiti artists and those around them should take responsibilty for their actions and not abdicate their responsibilties by saying it is a 'victimless crime'.I am quite sure that if someone popped along to your house and daubed graffiti on either your car or your house you would not look at it and just say 'Oh thats art' . I have no doubt that both lads are tallented and they should do well in the future ,but they and other such 'artists' CAN engage in thier passion of art without commiting crime.
Ally (01/09/2007 at 15:00)
And think of the knock on effect, what are the kids from the work shops going to do without TJ there to teach them, to give them something to focus on?
Yes they did something wrong but the punishment clearly doesnt fit the crime, and those of you who think it does, take a long hard look at yourselves and tell me you have been such a saint!! who are you to judge other people when i bet your not so pure yourself !!
G-Man (01/09/2007 at 15:01)
These chaps aren't thugs with nothing better to do but talented individuals who are merely expressing themselves.
Maybe the police in general should concentrate on catching the mindless fools who mug, assault or use physical violence for their own sick enjoyment.
David Begg-Robertson (01/09/2007 at 15:06)
Breadmikey, Poynton (01/09/2007 at 15:54)
Free Kreky and Mers x
Phil Heathcote
Giles (01/09/2007 at 16:16)
Why don't they allow their house to be vandalised/graffited by these two if they think it is alright to vandalise peoples property. As for their friend on here well I am very intelligent and am not bad with a paintbrush. Can I come round to your house at 2am and garaffit the outside. Thought not.
My business premises were vandalised by idiots like this once and it cost £8,000 to clean up. That year I didn't give any bonuses to the warehouse staff because I had to pay for the clean up.
These people have no respect for other people and their property whatsoever.
Giles (01/09/2007 at 16:27)
What would you say if you woke up and someone had aerosoled your car and it was graffiti of the highest standard? Would you stand back and admire it and leave it on? Probably not. So what's the difference with these two immature chaps?
It is a bit arrogant of them to think that the public wants to see their 'art' on trains and on the side of private property. Spray your own place if you like it that much.
I play in a band and think that our music is excellent. Would you like it if I pitched up on your lawn and belted out my 'art' all day long? Maybe my 'art' is your 'noise'. Maybe their 'art' is other peoples mindless vandalism.
I don't fancy a stretch in prison so I don't break the law. If they are intelligent then they should go around causinf criminal damage which, strangely enough, is against the law.
Olivia, manchester (01/09/2007 at 16:28)
Do the right thing.Free them.
x
thaitanium (01/09/2007 at 16:37)
Can you enlighten us as what that has got to do with these two defacing property?
Perhaps when they get out you can invite them round to do a custom paint job on your car.
In the mean time as they like painting so much give them a 4 inch brush each and let them paint their cells.
MH, WA9 (01/09/2007 at 16:46)
I'm sure the maintenance people at the train depots really appreciate the "art" too, having to clean it off rather than spend time maintaining irrelevant stuff like brakes and wheels.
Give 'em stiffer sentences judge, and try sending other crims down as well
freedom of speech (01/09/2007 at 17:23)
1. Markings, as initials, slogans, or drawings, written, spray-painted, or sketched on a sidewalk, wall of a building or public restroom, or the like: This graffiti are evidence of the neighbourhood’s decline.
Crim·i·nal
1. Of the nature of or involving crime
2. Guilty of crime
3. A person guilty or convicted of a crime.
Dam-age
1. Harm or injury to property or a person, resulting in loss of value or the impairment of usefulness.
You cant argue with the English Dictionary despite any Graffiti biased views one may have.
Ally (01/09/2007 at 18:28)