OFFICIALS are working round the clock to meet a deadline of next Tuesday to offer to introduce congestion charging to Greater Manchester's roads in return for £3bn of public transport improvements.
They need to complete bid documents for £1.2bn from the government's Transport Innovation Fund in return for accepting congestion charging - after a vote of eight to two by the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities yesterday.
Anti-congestion charge campaigners gathered outside a packed Dukinfield town hall where the vote took place.
The extra investment - another £2bn would be borrowed against the proceeds of charging drivers up to £5 a day to travel in and out - would lead to a public transport revolution including an expanded Metrolink network, longer trains and high quality bus services.
Park and Ride and Yellow School Buses would also be included in the biggest and most far-reaching transport investment programme outside London.
Only Trafford and Stockport voted against letting the bid go ahead after Sir Richard Leese, Manchester City Council leader who chaired the meeting, had warned: "If we do not make this bid, we have no prospect of serious investment in public transport for the next decade."
Four tests
The AGMA leaders heard that the independent panel of local business representatives and economists, who have been scrutinising the bid development process since October 2006, have been satisfied that the four tests set by AGMA for a suitable TIF bid had been met sufficiently to allow the bid to be submitted.
They concluded that 80 per cent of promised public transport improvements would be in place before charging is introduced - probably in 2012 - with the other 20 per cent following over the next two years.
Sir Richard said afterwards: "The current debate about the future of transport in Greater Manchester is rightly intense. No-one has suggested however that do-nothing is an option. The overwhelming majority of businesses and the general public see rising congestion as one of the biggest threats to our future prosperity.
"If we don't tackle effectively rising congestion our growth path will be affected: business costs will continue to rise, labour markets will shrink and some 30,000 jobs will be lost to the area.
"We are all agreed that investment must come first, before any congestion charging, which in any event would only apply in the working week at peak periods. This is the key to giving choices so that the travelling public can enjoy realistic alternatives of reliable, high quality public transport including the renewal and expansion of Metrolink."
Work on detailing the inner boundary will begin next month and the Department for Transport will announce its decision in December.
But even if Greater Manchester beats its rivals to the fund, there will be several years of work before a final decision is made.
What do you think? Have your say.
Tweet
C-charge: Bid goes in on Tuesday
July 28, 2007
CONGESTION: Bid to be submitted on Tuesday

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Malcolm Amer (28/07/2007 at 10:14)
A nony mouse, Atherton (28/07/2007 at 10:45)
Snare Drum, Ashton-under-Lyne (28/07/2007 at 13:01)
Sean, Manchester (28/07/2007 at 13:12)
Despite the fact that he has announced that the scheme will make £180 or £118 million depending on who you believe his minions will be working hard to put a bid together! What utter rot.
Ben Matthews (28/07/2007 at 14:23)
Joey, Ashton under Lyne, (28/07/2007 at 15:04)
The City on Manchester is one eigth in the total of Greater Manchester. It got by by attracting shoppers and businesses - No more I feel! Now there will be cheaper alternatives. If you had a business in Leeds and one in Manchester to have a Branch Manager will cost you 2 grand more in Manchester.
chorlton chris, Manchester (28/07/2007 at 16:01)
norman b, Salford (28/07/2007 at 16:32)
norman b, Salford (28/07/2007 at 16:53)
Joey, Ashton under Lyne, (28/07/2007 at 16:53)
The perks of "company car" is to visit clients, collect and deliver, pick people up from the station etc just like the big wigs yesterday could have used public transport they chose (wisely) to travel by car - why? because you are not productive waiting at the bus stop - waiting at the train station for the connection in twenty minutes. Being messed around by not having a connection between Stockport and Bolton and having to walk across Manchester to get a fresh bus.
I used to have to visit about 50 offices a week in Greater Manchester, travelling by puplic transport I would only have managed 20 at the most.
so that means employing someone else which is a no brainer - Business people are not going to pay every day - they will purchase season/yearly tickets for all their fleet for every day of the year (100 quid fine if their driver forget pay the tax - they cannot take the risk.)
Chris, Irlam (28/07/2007 at 17:49)
By the time we get to 2012 I'll wager less than half of the promised improvements have been made when this Toll Tax hits.
As Snaredrum says we anti's have been telling you all this for months now and here we see the chickens coming home to roost.
If you are against this then FIGHT IT as that's the only way this will be turned around!
ace, manchester (28/07/2007 at 17:54)
Ali A, Chorlton (28/07/2007 at 17:55)
If anything, the proposals will lead to Greater Manchester becoming a more attractive option for businesses, shoppers and residents, with less peak-time congestion, a greatly improved public transport system (to the benefit of everyone, especially those who can't afford to own a car), and a reduction in air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions (again, to the benefit of everyone, and in particular the most vulnerable in society such as the young and elderly)...
paul teeque (28/07/2007 at 18:32)
£2080 a year of you hard earned money to fund public transport, something the government should be funded if they are so interested in Manchester.
Make sure they vote against Labour.
Spread the word
john (28/07/2007 at 19:04)
All this scheme will achieve will be a shift of wealth from car commuters to the bus companies and away from local economies. But at least Gordon Brown will get his share of the bus company profits to waste on aircraft carriers, nuclear weapons, PFI schemes, £2000/day consultants, illegal wars.....
Snare Drum, Ashton-under-Lyne (28/07/2007 at 19:05)
Peter Roberts, Telford (28/07/2007 at 19:13)
"if you don't like it, don't drive"
You really don't understand what is happening do you.
Once the capital cost of a car is paid, travelling to work is relatively cheap.
by using public transport, you don't pay the up-front capital cost, but a higher charge per mile to cover the capital costs associated with providing the service.
If we now introduce a £5 charge for drivers, they have no choice but to pay more. They will either pay to use public transport at about £5 per day or pay the CC.
This means every person who uses a car today will pay more to travel to work - and an awful lot cannot afford to.
Road Pricing is being forced on you by the public transport companies (privately owned) who see a giant windfall. This has nothing to do with congestion, or environmental issues. It has everything to do with government corruption and corporate greed.
Peter Roberts, Telford (28/07/2007 at 19:14)
"if you don't like it, don't drive"
You really don't understand what is happening do you.
Once the capital cost of a car is paid, travelling to work is relatively cheap.
by using public transport, you don't pay the up-front capital cost, but a higher charge per mile to cover the capital costs associated with providing the service.
If we now introduce a £5 charge for drivers, they have no choice but to pay more. They will either pay to use public transport at about £5 per day or pay the CC.
This means every person who uses a car today will pay more to travel to work - and an awful lot cannot afford to.
Road Pricing is being forced on you by the public transport companies (privately owned) who see a giant windfall. This has nothing to do with congestion, or environmental issues. It has everything to do with government corruption and corporate greed.
Cheeky, Manchester (28/07/2007 at 19:51)
shayla (28/07/2007 at 20:16)
It was by the Specials, it was called
"Ghost Town"
Look up the lyrics and you'll know what I mean.
The congestion charge will cripple Manchester and it's residents.
Shame on you.
Natalie, Irlam (28/07/2007 at 20:31)
m_dm, Miles Platting (28/07/2007 at 21:19)
wkdboy1, Hyde (28/07/2007 at 21:31)
Simon B, www.manchestertolltax.com (28/07/2007 at 21:42)
Pop of Trafford 210145
Total 491145
Thats nealy 1/2 a million people AGMA has basicly said "them and their council's don't count"
That 1/2 a million people.
1/5 of the population of greater manchester
1 in 5
this is no victory, this is an abuse of the rights of the people who live in Stockport and Trafford.
Sean, Manchester (28/07/2007 at 22:29)
Finding that amount of money each year for the next 30 years will be the priority, not solving congestion. Did you also realise that after the debt is repaid we will continue to pay the con charge but all money's go straight to central Gov.
Still think its a good idea?