CONTROVERSIAL plans to introduce road congestion charging received overwhelming backing from members of the public at a key consultation meeting in Manchester.
A vote revealed 70 in favour with just twelve against, at a question and answer forum organised by the Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Authority.
The packed-out meeting at Manchester Town Hall was told that the proposals to charge a fee of up to £5 per day to drivers coming in and out of the city at peak travel times, is a key part of a possible bid to the government for a massive £3 billion package of funding to `revolutionise' public transport in Greater Manchester.
And PTA chairman Coun Roger Jones who chaired the meeting, made it clear that in his view "You can't have one without the other."
Leaders of the ten Greater Manchester district councils have until the end of this month to decide on whether to submit the Transport Innovation Fund bid.
Coun Jones told the meeting: "It is a one-off chance to transform public transport across this area, and if we bid, we will be competing with major cities across the country. If we don't bid, it's not the end of the matter. We will still need the same funding, - we will just have to look elsewhere for it."
The package includes a full range of measures aimed at tackling the region's congested roads, and stretched to the limit transport system.
Elements
Key elements are completion of the Metrolink system with trams running out to Oldham, Rochdale, Stockport and Manchester Airport, and huge improvements in both bus and rail services.
The package also includes an increase in park and ride facilities, and plans to extend yellow school bus schemes to eventually cover every secondary school across the county.
Coun Jones said it was vital that the PTA was given control of the county's bus network, which would happen if the proposed new Transport Bill became law.
He urged members of the public to lobby councillors and MP's to ensure its success.
"If you don't get buses right, you can't solve the problems of public transport" he said. "It is vital that services are extended to reach parts of the region that are currently not reached."
The meeting was told that taking no action on the issue of congestion was not an option. Car use is expected to increase by 25 per cent over the next ten years, causing huge environmental problems and bringing traffic to a standstill.
Former councillor and transport planner Peter Johnson from Bolton, told the meeting: "The argument for taking action on congestion is overwhelming.
"You have an incident anywhere on the M60 circular motorway and within minutes there is gridlock. There is simply no alternative."
But there were still opponents to the idea. Dave Culshaw, representing two Wigan residents groups said: "The congestion charge map looks remarkably similar to a spider's web, and I believe we have been spun a web of deceit."
He claimed: "In my view congestion has been deliberately created in many areas of Greater Manchester by the introduction of traffic management schemes including bus lanes and one-way systems. Get rid of these dotty road schemes and we might get somewhere."
Plans to introduce congestion charging will come under intense public scrutiny on Tuesday, when key players will go head-to-head on TV.
Organised by MEN Media, the Question Time-style debate will take place at Urbis before an audience of business and council leaders and M.E.N. readers, and will be televised by our sister TV station Channel M.
Tweet
C-charge: Public meeting backs plan
July 14, 2007
GMPTE: Majority in favour

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Manchester Against Road Tolls (14/07/2007 at 08:57)
There were a few other people there, one of whom asked whther there would be a referndum - the answer was silence, after all you can't invite the voters at a referendum.
Laura Norder, Didsbury (14/07/2007 at 10:05)
They have their own political agenda and now the people have spoken, they should just accept it. I will gladly assist those who claimed they would move out of Greater Manchester with packing - we don't need you.
PW, Manchester (14/07/2007 at 10:13)
rammylad, ramsbottom (14/07/2007 at 10:25)
ace, manchester (14/07/2007 at 10:42)
What do you expect from people who will do anything to get what they want? they work out times of the day and the venue. They have designes a system over the last few years to create a problem with congestion making four lane roads into two, what madness is that? our road system has gone backwards in manchester a hundred years ago we had two lane then we built roads with four lanes ,then the so called traffic designers put bus lanes and parking bays which made most roads back into two lane roads which is a backward step ..this is one of the problems with traffic ..
BOBTILTD, URMSTON (14/07/2007 at 10:56)
11:00 Friday, a working day for most of us, how would normal working people be able to attend!!!
Vincit Omnia Industria, Radcliffe (14/07/2007 at 11:58)
Joey, Ashton under Lyne, (14/07/2007 at 12:19)
"Overwhelming backing" of people who have a vested interest is a bit rich 80 people for the scheme 12 against and 2.500,000 not asked. Democracy in action?
BOBTILTD, URMSTON (14/07/2007 at 12:20)
I was present at a PUBLIC meeting last Wednesday set up by Trafford Council to TRULY test general opinion, at that meeting there was just 1 vote in favour of this charge.
BOBTILTD, URMSTON (14/07/2007 at 12:21)
I was present at a PUBLIC meeting last Wednesday set up by Trafford Council to TRULY test general opinion, at that meeting there was just 1 vote in favour of this charge.
Snare Drum, Ashton-under-Lyne (14/07/2007 at 12:54)
Graeme, Manchester (14/07/2007 at 13:14)
wkdboy1, Hyde (14/07/2007 at 13:29)
Bryan Neill (14/07/2007 at 13:37)
In my view Manchester traffic problems are very few compared to other cities such as London and Birmingham. Most people¿s commutes to and from work are reasonable and have not deteriorated dramatically over the past decade. The scheme is not necessary for our area and is definitely not wanted by anyone I know. People must be aware there are vested interests in play here. Companies will make millions if not billions through the introduction of road tolling for Manchester and the bureaucrats will get fatter and fatter creating more unnecessary jobs and spend more public money and what difference will it make..Didily Squat.
Recent fictitious interviews with Manchester citizens highlight corrupt methods that will be used to force this scheme through. I say to the Manchester public write to your MP¿s your local councillors and let them know what you think. Demand a FAIR ballot of the Manchester public before such a scheme is implemented.
djay (14/07/2007 at 14:39)
As a main source of local news you have a responsibility to be fair and accurate in your reporting, this article is neither.
john (14/07/2007 at 15:22)
Dave Pickup (14/07/2007 at 16:46)
Bobby (14/07/2007 at 18:17)
paul teeque (14/07/2007 at 18:30)
All the people who voted the scheme was a good idea on the "what do you think" website were invited to this.
Why is this the first time the "public" have backed this when ALL other surveys are 80% AGAINST this?
This charming Manc (14/07/2007 at 18:48)
Simon B, www.manchestertolltax.com (14/07/2007 at 19:27)
The question that was asked was "do you in principle support the improved public transport plans".
You did not ask "are you in favour of the congestion charge"
Chapman (14/07/2007 at 20:55)
Taliesin71, www.randomjottings.co.uk (14/07/2007 at 21:35)
Marion Madden (14/07/2007 at 21:47)
rammylad, ramsbottom (14/07/2007 at 22:52)