HE is the real-life "Terry from Rochdale"... but his views on congestion charging are not likely to appear in any council leaflet.
After the M.E.N. revealed that transport chiefs had created fake case studies to promote their road pricing scheme for Greater Manchester we decided to seek some genuine examples of our own.
In the leaflet posted to 2.5 million homes in the region, one of the examples was "Terry from Rochdale" who turned out to be a 22-year-old US model called Erich Dalke from Seattle.
But it didn't take us long to find the genuine article - Terry Mason, who runs his own car dealership and has lived in Rochdale for 50 years.
The 61-year-old travels to Manchester for regular visits to the theatre and many of his workforce come to the city to pick up car parts.
He was aware of the invented case studies and slammed those behind them for what he called 'blatant deceit'.
Mr Mason said: "I'm not surprised they have done this without consulting anyone. Nobody listens to what the public has to say until it's election time and after all their promises they just do what they want. There's no honesty these days."
Mr Mason believes that there needs to be 'major improvements' to public transport and said he thought congestion charging should only be used 'as a last resort'.
And he accused transport chiefs of `ignoring the man in the street'.
He said: "I know families who go to work and put their kids in nurseries. They make hardly any more money than they would if they stayed at home on benefits. If this charge comes in it's taking more off them and removing the incentive for them to go to work. Is that we want?"
The leaflet issued by the GMPTA also cited the case of Ann, a solicitor from Ashton who turned out to be a US model named Kiki.
Ashton
Ann Thomas, 60, on the other hand, really does live in Ashton and avoids travelling into the city centre because of "unreliable" public transport.
She slammed the pamphlet and said: "You see the government criticise firms who run competitions where there is no prize - making up four people is no different."
It proved slightly harder to track down a 'Neil from Beswick' in the time available, but we did manage to find Neil Hardy, a 32-year-old sales manager from neighbouring Openshaw.
Mr Hardy also claimed that public transport was not up to scratch. "If it was then congestion charging might be acceptable," he said. "But I used to get the bus to the city and it was hit-and-miss. To be honest it can be horrendous from this side of town."
And he was also not surprised that false case studies had been used.
"They're trying to direct people's thoughts towards it being a positive thing when I think that most people are actually against it," he added.
It emerged yesterday that the decision to create the fake case studies was taken by a group of twelve officials involved in preparing Greater Manchester's bid to the government's Transport Innovation Fund.
Asked why the case studies were invented rather than based on interviews with real people, a spokeswoman said: "They were worked out very carefully using all the details available.
"It is impossible to interview anybody about the situation in 2012. Nobody is paying it at the moment and it is impossible to interview anybody about that."
What do you think? Have your say.
YOU can also watch our c-charge video story above.
Tweet
What Terry REALLY thinks of c-charge
July 10, 2007

Showing comments 1 to 21 and replies | View All
Simon B, www.manchestertolltax.com (10/07/2007 at 08:16)
The real Terry is normal bloke who like the rest has common sense, the congestion charge is a very bad idea.
I was at a meeting with Sir Richard Leese last night, his own words were they were going to be a "guinea pig" for congestion charging, His mind's already made up with the way he talked last night.
Simon B, www.manchestertolltax.com (10/07/2007 at 08:24)
MART Website
www.manchestertolltax.com
Anti Con charge petition
www.gopetition.com/online/12888.html
please pass it around please.
we have 8 days to stop it!!!
Neutral (10/07/2007 at 10:44)
Simon, I am sure you probably have too.
There is another one tonight.
Those involved don't have to do this - read the Transport Bill and you'll understand why.
The government have passed the responsibility to the local leaders - who you and I voted in in May.
Simon - did you not hear about the public consultation, or the business event, or the numerous questionnaires, leaflets and surveys that have, and are, being carried out on this subject?
I am amazed that this is being considered front page news. I am pretty sure I too could find somebody who is a solicitor, who drives in from Ashton, who will take the Met. Or a Terry, from Rochdale, who actually supports the charge. But the underlying message of what would actually happen is surely the key thing here.
As usual, a case of selective reporting. If I worked for the MEN, I'd be ashamed.
had enough (10/07/2007 at 11:22)
In my view the congestion has to be addressed, doing nothing is not an option.
There is a deadline for an expression of interest via a Tiff Bid. We need to support going to the next stage but acknowledge there is more work to be done especially in the area around the intermediate Ring Road.
There is a large amount of money available from the government for the scheme. In my view we would be
remiss not to consider the benefits from a vastly improved public transport system.
Regards
lebist, Blackley (10/07/2007 at 11:43)
PW, Manchester (10/07/2007 at 11:54)
Simon B, www.manchestertolltax.com (10/07/2007 at 12:18)
Improved public transport could bring another 30000.
However
Andrew Simpson, the boss of Peel Holdings said that imposing the congestion charge is a big risk, it could endanger future growth as Manchester would become less competitive vs Liverpool, Leeds and Warrington.
Why would you choose to come to Manchester when Liverpool and Leeds are free of the congestion charge?
On the sale of the Airport, Richard Leese scaremongered over increased council tax, but Andrew Simpson counter with the fact that Manchester Airport Group MAG only paid a dividend of 25 million last year, if the council sold it, they could simply bank the money and earn nearly 5 times more in interest per year.
A man with his own small business at the Manchester science park, asked how he was supposed to keep his employees when they were priced off the road.
He employs 10 people, and he knows at least one of them would have to leave due to the charge.
Paul Lockett (10/07/2007 at 12:23)
Laura Norder, Didsbury (10/07/2007 at 13:24)
Used car dealer states: "There's no honesty these days."
Stop it - it hurts!!!
mancmonkey (10/07/2007 at 13:33)
Like the Kaiser Chiefs, i predict a riot!!!!!!!!!!!
Snare Drum, Ashton-under-Lyne (10/07/2007 at 15:43)
It must be true though that locals don't exist because nobody on the council is listening to us.
ace, manchester (10/07/2007 at 15:49)
Graeme, Manchester (11/07/2007 at 00:37)
The 'case studies' in the leaflet are simply examples of what people with certain types of travel patterns would pay under a congestion charge, if they still chose to drive.
They do not and were not meant to represent people's *opinions* - it was an information leaflet.
Did anyone really think these were real people?
The important thing is that these were realistic scenarios and useful examples to help people think about the way it might affect them.
PW, Manchester (11/07/2007 at 09:00)
Graeme, Manchester (11/07/2007 at 09:31)
Simon B, www.manchestertolltax.com (11/07/2007 at 09:37)
here is the original Blogger item that exsposed the scam case studys
ysr23.com/blog/?p=427
PW, Manchester (11/07/2007 at 10:04)
Simon B, www.manchestertolltax.com (11/07/2007 at 10:19)
500000 of OUR council tax so far
Joey, Ashton under Lyne, (11/07/2007 at 10:46)
edwards (11/07/2007 at 11:12)
Joey, Ashton under Lyne, (11/07/2007 at 11:39)
Two businessmen discussing a new northern branch or relocating in the North West.
How about Manchester??? No!! there, trafic is sooooo bad they are having to price motorists of the road to make the city work.