THE
Highways Agency
was branded 'shambolic' and 'not fit for purpose' at a public inquiry into the controversial Mottram to Tintwistle bypass.
Opponents of the £115m scheme called for the hearing to be adjourned after substantial new evidence was submitted just days before it was due to start.
The proposed 3.5-mile road would take motorists away from the congested roads of Mottram, Hollingworth and Tintwistle, and link Tameside with the A628 Woodhead Pass to Yorkshire.
Charles Calvert, for the Highways Agency, said it had not complied with the statutory requirements when submitting the evidence.
He told the inquiry at Stalybridge Civic Hall there had been a number of difficulties in trying to introduce the new material.
The evidence makes amendments and corrections to the agency's environmental statement.
Stephen Greenhalgh, Highways Agency project leader, said: "There were 330 documents which should have been provided on deposit, 49 were either incorrect or missing in some way.
"I'm advised it has now been rectified."
A number of groups oppose the plans and several called for the public inquiry to be adjourned as they had not had enough time to study the `vast' new evidence.
John Hall, who said he represented the people of Denton and Audenshaw, said: "This late submission is shambolic and totally discredits the inquiry.
"I've already asked for this hearing to be held and now I think it should be adjourned.
"The Highways Agency is not fit for purpose. They have had five months since February to correct their own incompetence and they still have not achieved it.
Unsuitable
"To allow us three days to look at this new evidence is totally and utterly unsuitable."
Anne Robinson, from the Friends of the Peak District, said: "We received this huge tome of documents and we need more time to go through it."
Pat Ellison, from Alternative Proposals for Transport, said: "We had documents cascading down on us, and as an archaeologist it is difficult when you cannot go to the beginning and work through."
Inspector John Watson, chairing the inquiry, agreed to hear opening arguments after which he said he would adjourn the hearing until next Tuesday.
A public inquiry was initially due to be held last year but it was postponed after 1,400 objections were lodged to the scheme.
Residents of Mottram, Tintwistle and Hollingworth have begged for a bypass since the 1970s as lorries have switched from the crowded M62 to cross the Pennines to Sheffield and the south.
The routes carry more than 40,000 vehicles a day, including 4,000 HGVs.
If the bypass opens, the Highways Agency predicts 70 per cent of traffic will be removed from Mottram, over 60 per cent from Tintwistle and about 25 per cent from Hollingworth.
Campaign groups have been set up, both supporting and objecting to the bypass.
*Click on the link to watch a video report.
Tweet
Agency slammed at bypass inquiry
June 27, 2007
Traffic queuing towards Mottram

Showing comments 1 to 6 and replies | View All
Chris, Irlam (27/06/2007 at 08:26)
John Hall, Tameside (27/06/2007 at 08:56)
9,000 living in a large widespread rural area get some benefits,and 47,000 living in a compacted area get further chronic pollution and vehicles into already a large Government designated Air Quality Management Area where Government Pollution Targets will never be met.
Report on the consequences of a Mottram ByPass M.E.N and stop indicating bias against the 47,000 (almost 25% of the Tameside electorate)who will suffer the consequences.
John Hall, Tameside (27/06/2007 at 09:04)
Please report facts and reality M.E.N
Sick of being blue, Tameside (28/06/2007 at 03:03)
I really do feel for the people living in that part of the Tameside. This by-pass is needed, It's okay for the objectors
they probably don't live in the area. Just look at the volume of traffic that passes through every day 40,000 vehicles,
it's a living nightmare, the people living there have the right like us all to breathe cleaner air as well.
The objections from the Denton camp doesn't hold water if the M67 wasn't there they would be up in arms asking for a
by-pass like they use to be when Crown Point use to be a bottle neck. Some folk have short memories.
Jeff (28/06/2007 at 13:31)
jackie (28/07/2007 at 18:11)