A FORMER mayor is suing her own council in a row over breastfeeding her son.
Councillor Dr Pauleen Lane was banned from using the mayoral car for her first month in office at Trafford Council because she wanted to breastfeed her baby and he would be with her at all times, Salford County Court heard.
For some engagements Mrs Lane even had to follow the civic car - which was carrying an attendant and the mayor's chain of office - in her Daihatsu car with baby Oscar on board.
Mrs Lane gave birth to Oscar two months before she became mayor. She decided to breastfeed her son for the first 12 months of his life.
Mr Gavin Millar, QC for Mrs Lane, said that normal arrangements were for the civic car to collect the mayor from their home or work and take them to various functions.
He claimed that during Mrs Lane's first month as mayor these arrangements were denied to her.
Mr Millar said that during the following six months to the end of 2005 she was only permitted access to this service when she found or paid for a second adult to accompany her in the car.
Sometimes the deputy mayoress was able to travel but often she could not.
The court heard how just one day into her office Mrs Lane, along with mayors from across Greater Manchester, were attending an event organised by church leaders.
Bishop of Hulme, Rt Rev Stephen Lowe, told the court of his "horror" when he saw the way Mrs Lane was treated when she attended the annual reception at Bishops Palace, Worsley Hall.
In a statement he said: "I was shocked when I saw Pauleen Lane arrive in her own car, a small vehicle that looked out of place in the line of mayoral civic vehicles.
"I then noticed that the civic vehicle for Trafford Council had also arrived with the two attendants but obviously separate from Mrs Lane. It then emerged that she had driven herself and her new baby to the event and the civic vehicle had just brought the civic chain.
"I watched the spectacle of Mrs Lane struggling to get herself , the baby, and associated baby paraphernalia out of her little car as the two attendants ceremoniously removed the mayoral chain from the large civic vehicle.
Embarrassing
"The spectacle struck me as most embarrassing for the mayor."
He said Mrs Lane explained how one of the attendants had complained to his boss about not wanting to be seen as a babysitter and he understood the attendants disapproved of her breastfeeding her son between mayoral duties.
Mr Millar said that by law Mrs Lane was entitled to six months maternity leave as an employee of Manchester University, which would enable her to breastfeed her son.
But there was no parallel entitlement in law to cover her while carrying out her civic duties as an elected representative.
Mrs Lane, who became Trafford's youngest ever first citizen in June 2005 at the age of 40, fought back tears as she explained her decision to breastfeed her son.
She said she wanted Oscar to be with her at all times so she could feed him in the way she believed best.
Paul Gilroy, QC for Trafford Council, said the milk could have been expressed using a pump and given to someone else to feed her son and it would not have interfered with her mayoral duties.
Mrs Lane said: "I attempted to express milk and found it terribly difficult. I was never able to express it in the type of quantity that would have been suitable."
She told the court that in November 2004 she had a meeting with the leader of the council Susan Williams to discuss her position as mayor.
She said that Coun Williams raised a number of points including the concern of the mayoral attendants Peter Garde and Stuart Mann. She said: "Some of these related to their concern about driving a baby in the car and being 'seen as nannies' particularly by other mayoral attendants in Greater Manchester.
Delay
"She suggested I delay becoming mayor for a year but after discussion we agreed that was not appropriate as a baby is actually easier to manage at engagements than a toddler."
She said at the meeting she explained that she intended to breastfeed her son and Mrs Williams replied "get him back on the bottle as soon as possible."
Just before she became mayor Mrs Lane was passed a note by a council officer. It said her son should not travel in the mayoral car and if she was looking after him she should not wear the mayoral chains.
She then attended a meeting on 31 May 2005 - the day before she was due to become mayor - with several councillors including the leader, in the hope the situation could be resolved, but it wasn't.
Mr Gilroy said that as well as her role as mayor, Mrs Lane served on several other bodies including English Partnerships, where she was deputy chairman, the Audit Commission, North West Development Agency, and the Institution of Civil Engineers. She was awarded a CBE in 2005 for services to local government.
He asked whether she took her son to appointments when working for the organisations.
She said she did take her son with her, adding: "I would leave the meeting, feed him, and come back - all of the bodies concerned facilitated this. There was no problem."
Mr Miller told the court she was claiming sex discrimination because she would not have received such treatment if she had been a male mayor and she was alleging her less favourable treatment was on the grounds of her sex.
Trafford Council deny sex discrimination and the case is expected to last four days.
What do you think? Have your say.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Leo Branca (16/05/2007 at 08:49)
ace, manchester (16/05/2007 at 09:39)
dennis tueart's lovechild, Bury (16/05/2007 at 09:48)
lebist, Blackley (16/05/2007 at 11:25)
ClaireW (16/05/2007 at 11:29)
NICHOLAS CAMPBELL (16/05/2007 at 11:32)
cmc (16/05/2007 at 11:43)
Andy., Bury (16/05/2007 at 12:09)
As has been said this story does not reflect well on Trafford MBC which looks like it needs to wake up in the 21st century.
Pete (16/05/2007 at 13:16)
ace, manchester (16/05/2007 at 14:08)
Im sure that a insurance company would not like the idea of the lord mayors car being used as a nursery....
ally3 (16/05/2007 at 14:47)
" An employer must provide adequate rest, meal and refreshments breaks for women who have given birth in the last six months and women who are breastfeeding, and provide `suitable facilities¿ for a breastfeeding mother to `rest¿. Recent guidelines from the European Commission recommend that rest facilities should include access to a private room, provision of a clean fridge to store milk, and time off to express milk or to breastfeed. These guidelines don¿t have statutory force but should persuade, or at the very least encourage, employers and employment tribunals to apply the law in a way that supports breastfeeding at work".
These are guidelines from UNISON.
I also know that many councils have flexible working and creches, none of the above seems to have been offered to her or any other solutions other than the unhelpful comment by a male collegue "get him on the bottle".
Breastfeeding should be encouraged, all the government recent publications such as the NSF and off shoot maternity matters all are trying not only to increase initiation of BF but also increasing duration. Surely the ex mayor should be applauded for being progresive in her approach not only in Bf but in her parenting approach!
I support this woman whole heartedly...
jacqueline renshaw (16/05/2007 at 14:49)
I breastfed my daughter for 2.5 years. I couldn't work. What the heck makes this woman think she can.
Then when I paid more attention, the word COMPENSATION jumped right out at me.
Andy., Bury (16/05/2007 at 14:58)
Some of the view expressed here are out of the ark. Tell me just what is the difficulty here? Breastfeeding is a natural thing to do, indeed it is encouraged by midwives because it isseen as beneficial to child development. Just how difficult would it have been to accommodate the Mayor and her son. Not very seems the simple answer.
Still what we should do is send out a message that mothers should not be able to pursue their careers for fear of offending those with prehistoric views.
Leo Branca (16/05/2007 at 15:39)
Christina (16/05/2007 at 15:46)
Andy., Bury (16/05/2007 at 16:06)
You touch on a wider issue though which is access to workplace chilcare which remains a total lottery.
ally3 (16/05/2007 at 16:30)
"Dr Lane could have lengthened her maternity leave as millions of women do"
MEN quote:
"But there was no parallel entitlement in law to cover her while carrying out her civic duties as an elected representative"
sallyg, Lancs (16/05/2007 at 16:48)
However, I cannot see any legislation that says that they MUST provide transport for both mother and child.
What was her problem with following the mayoral car in her own car? It worked for her, didn't it?
The alternative was for her to travel in the mayoral car and for someone to follow with her son.
As far as I can see, the employers only need to provide time for the mother to feed the child or express milk to feed the child.
She wasn't going to feed him in the mayoral car, was she? Not while he was strapped into a seat. So she's not been incovenienced in any way at all.
Steve (16/05/2007 at 17:51)
David Anthony, none (16/05/2007 at 18:44)
sallyg, Lancs (16/05/2007 at 18:53)
I really don't see what the problem was.
She was allowed to take him to her functions and she did so, in her own car.
She was not stopped from breastfeeding at all. The situation worked out just fine.
Ms D, Manchester (16/05/2007 at 20:24)
thinkingreed (16/05/2007 at 22:07)
Pete Brady (16/05/2007 at 22:08)
Pete Brady (16/05/2007 at 22:09)