NEW powers for teachers will allow them to crack down on the "am I bovvered?" generation of unruly schoolchildren, the Education Secretary has insisted.
Alan Johnson said many disruptive youngsters took their lead from the Lauren character in The Catherine Tate Show.
But, in an interview with the Sunday Mirror, he said they could expect to be hauled back into line with new punishments which come into law tomorrow.
Teachers will be able to use "reasonable force" with aggressive youngsters, confiscate mobile phones and hand out Saturday detentions.
Aggressive
"These new powers are aimed at unresponsive and aggressive kids whose attitude owes much to the 'am I bovvered?' character made famous by Catherine Tate," Mr Johnson said.
The measures, introduced under last year's Education and Inspections Act, are the first major change to teachers' guidelines on discipline for a decade.
Teachers have complained that the previous guidelines were not clear enough and it was not always clear that they had the law on their side.
Mr Johnson went on: "Most kids are well-behaved in school, but we want to take action against those who are consistently rude, disruptive and disrespectful.
"They're making life miserable for teachers and spoiling it for children who do want to learn.
"Teachers now have a clear legal power to act swiftly and decisively against trouble makers.
"It means kids that step out of line can expect to be appropriately punished."
What do you think? Have your say.
Tweet
Teachers to get tough
April 01, 2007
Unruly kids will be appropriately punished

Showing comments 1 to 22 and replies | View All
lebist, Blackley (01/04/2007 at 12:41)
PW, Manchester (01/04/2007 at 14:28)
David,North Manchester (01/04/2007 at 14:36)
marc (01/04/2007 at 15:29)
J Sheldon (01/04/2007 at 16:35)
I saw some classroom behaviour on television when a teacher took a covert camera in. It was out of control. Obviously after it was shown, action was taken. Yes the teacher lost her job.
hodie, wiltshire (01/04/2007 at 16:45)
However, until the attitudes of the "can't be bovvered" parents, a.k.a "it's not my child's fault" or "what do you expect me to do - I can't do anything with him/her" (and I have heard this said of two year olds) we will get nowhere.
qwarky, oldham (01/04/2007 at 16:53)
There are also children within the school population with social interaction problems such as autism/ aspbergers syndrom.It is difficult for them to judge correct behaviour in any social context. Beating such children only scars and alienates them more from society.
The discipline hankered for by some should remain a thing of the past, however a teacher should be able to restrain a child who is about to assault them or a fellow pupil with impunity.
However if a thug or bully is discovered they should be removed from the others and put through a proper psychological process.
Dave Pickup (01/04/2007 at 16:56)
2) I wonder how many teachers are going to get thumped by irate parents for daring to punish their poor little luvs?
3) Will teachers go into school on Saturdays to supervise detention or will they employ retired SAS people?
4) David,N M/c. You are right. Pond life parents produce pond life children. Trouble is, what is the definition of 'normal behaviour? A child may do something which it regards as being normal but is reprehensible to right minded people. The child needs to Know better!
janetj235, chorlton (01/04/2007 at 23:32)
TM (01/04/2007 at 23:42)
gato (01/04/2007 at 23:52)
Jim from Canada, Toronto Canada (02/04/2007 at 00:46)
side burns pulled, the strap, six of the best,detention, oh the memories!! Won't get away with ot nowadays though.If parents don't bring their kids up to respect authority the teachers will always have a tough job. The bleeding hearts will be the loudest noise on this subject not the average man/woman in the street who has to suffer the conseqeuncies of some snotty nosed little fool acting up because his/her parents didn't instill respect for others into them when they should have. And why do you need a phone in a class? Are they that important that they can't switch it off for a few hours? What a joke!!
Colin W, Stockholm (02/04/2007 at 05:40)
Bill, Kiriat Motzkin (02/04/2007 at 08:19)
Womble, Westhoughton (02/04/2007 at 09:13)
Rachel, Manchester (02/04/2007 at 11:15)
busman_dave, manchester (02/04/2007 at 19:10)
LookingForLogic, Stockport (03/04/2007 at 01:15)
"wotevoh" is sometimes all they know, the only way they can communicate to those who are trying to communicate with them, & while I agree there have to be sanctions to avoid unnacceptable behaviour, there needs to be some degree of mediation between proffessionals & young people.
Colin W, Stockholm (03/04/2007 at 10:13)
Ace Riley (03/04/2007 at 12:21)
Jo (03/04/2007 at 12:21)
Since corporal punishment is outlawed in all schools at present, if we take corporal punishment as the answer to all our problems, how do we account for the hundreds of schools which have an excellent disciplinary and academic record without it? I went to an ordinary comprehensive school with pupils from a range of social backgrounds and with a range of academic abilities, and the school did (and still does, fourteen years after my departure) manage to achieve excellent results. I also have a friend who works in a comprehensive school and who manages to cope with her classes perfectly well, while some other teachers struggle to manage exactly the same pupils. I'm not saying that corporal punishment is never appropriate, but there is a hell of lot more to proper discipline in schools than that.
Jo (03/04/2007 at 12:28)