The square was awarded a landscaping prize last year, but city-based Ed Bennis said he could `hardly be more disappointed' with the judges' verdict.
He claims the space was a poorly-conceived mish-mash of different architectural styles and has quickly turned into a muddy mess after being trampled on by thousands of visitors.
Figures show more than 28m people walked across the gardens last year and the space is used for a variety of events, from a Christmas ice rink to summer farmers' markets. Council bosses admit the sheer volume of pedestrians has made the grass worn and muddy in places.
The area was revitalised following the IRA bomb of 1997.
Millions were spent redesigning the concourse to include grassy meeting areas, striking concrete barriers and fountains.
In November, experts honoured the `benchmark' project in the annual Landscape Institute awards. But Bennis, from Manchester Metropolitan University - a consultant in major European park projects - said the judges should be ashamed.
Writing in architecture journal Green Places, he said: "One can hardly be more disappointed in the judges' choice seeing the scheme today: poor drainage, undersized paths, worn out grass, mud and dereliction.
"The panel said the scheme gives `the quality of design that the British public realm deserves and sets a benchmark'. Well the benchmark must be set exceptionally low. The selection of Piccadilly Gardens has undermined the award system."
The space was planned by architectural consortium Edaw after the terrorist bomb attack in the 90s and the pavilion centrepiece is by renowned Japanese architect Tadao Ando.
City centre councillor Pat Karney admitted the site was a victim of its own success. "We are happy to hear any suggestions for improving things," he said. "The main problem is that four times as many people as before are now using the gardens."
What do you think of the gardens? Have your say.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Terry (08/03/2007 at 07:37)
PW, Manchester (08/03/2007 at 08:46)
curiousyellow, Rusholme (08/03/2007 at 08:58)
Ms D, Manchester (08/03/2007 at 09:16)
Ace Riley (08/03/2007 at 09:57)
Michael Crowe (08/03/2007 at 10:00)
Michael Crowe (08/03/2007 at 10:00)
Rachel, Manchester (08/03/2007 at 11:06)
Graham, At work (08/03/2007 at 11:39)
Mark, South Manchester (08/03/2007 at 11:41)
We begged the council not to build an office block on Piccadilly Gardens and said the proposals were "just not good enough" for Manchester. But the City Council totally ignored us - in-fact one councillor referred to people who complained about the plans as "middle-class t----rs!" (I wonder if he'll now apologise?)
Yeah public consultation in Manchester - but only as long as we agree with the City Council eh??
David,North Manchester (08/03/2007 at 11:45)
dglp (08/03/2007 at 13:37)
Is it new, or not-so-new?
How does a new park qualify as derelict? Seems an odd choice of words for a new park.
Or is it a not-so-new park that the judges were tardy in recognising? If so, what took them so long, and did they not bother to visit it first?
BlackleyB, Blackley (08/03/2007 at 13:37)
Paul, Manchester (08/03/2007 at 14:10)
Okay, it had its problems, but I don't think levelling it out and adding a large dose of concrete has been a huge success either!
The fountains are okay (when they're working) but the rest has been a failure.
David, North Manchester (08/03/2007 at 20:11)
Tillytot, Manchester (08/03/2007 at 20:36)
Yes Manchester gets it's share of 'yobs' but flowers are good. Maybe getting rid of grass all together and designing some art work under a glass floor or something that looks like a garden but is more effective and practical is needed.
Aussie, koolewong,new south wales (08/03/2007 at 21:35)
LookingForLogic, Stockport (09/03/2007 at 00:26)
It's all very well having green flag parks in posh areas, which look nice but don't offer facilities for all ages, but how do the government propose to provide 'greenspace' areas for all when they can't even manage the upkeep of the prestigious ones?
marc (09/03/2007 at 09:52)
MisterSalford, Salford, Manchester (09/03/2007 at 11:31)
As a mancunian I am ashamed to walk through Piccadilly gardens each day and either see it full of threaterning yobs - either young people dressed in full 'street riot gear' or the other type of yobs such as 'street wardens'! The Office block 'One' piccadilly gardens is an ugly monstrosity plonked on what was once a tree lined avenue pavement of Portland Street which gave the gardens a 'grand, cosmopolitain feel'. Everyone in Manchester HATES the 'wall' it must be pulled down and if it is not I myself will personaly deface the thing with graffiti to highlight what a poor piece of urban planning it is. To call it a sculpture is an insult to anything considered 'art'. Pat Karney should also be ashamed of what he's created. Maybe we should create a giant statue of him and our other civic dictators for the pigeons to honour?
Gloria (09/03/2007 at 15:14)
Most major citys have a public space where people can meet and enjoy the surroundings,this is not one of them
Keith Whitworth (09/03/2007 at 15:51)
edwards (09/03/2007 at 16:27)
Al Capone, Atherton (09/03/2007 at 17:13)
This is the heart of the city.
Come on M.E.N. Get the ball rolling!
JohnB, Manchester (09/03/2007 at 17:18)
I would remove the wall, install many more trees, plant flowers, create a proper, traditional water fountain to compliment the historic statues in the gardens.
It would be a fantastic idea if the council held a competition and let US, the people that want to use it design the garden for them. The winner gets their plan put into place.