Home | Politics

Politics

Paying the high price for our democracy

Cost of freedom: election candidates spent thousands on their campaigns

THE M.E.N. today reveals how Greater Manchester MPs and their opponents spent tens of thousands of pounds fighting the election.

Expenses papers returned by candidates detail the spiralling costs of the battle for some of the region’s hardest-fought seats.

None of the spending involves tax payers’ cash. Most of it is covered by donations from local branches of the various political parties.

But we can also reveal the high-profile backers that some MPs enjoy, including Manchester Central MP Tony Lloyd, whose campaign had financial support from property developers Tom Bloxham and the Opal Property Group.

However, the files also show money cannot buy victory. Former Lib Dem MP Paul Rowen spent almost £30,000 – double his Labour rival Simon Danczuk – but failed to hold his Rochdale seat.

Tory candidate Deborah Dunleavy spent £34,685 trying to win Bolton North East. She failed to take it from Labour MP David Crausby, who spent £19,319.

Lucy Powell, the Labour candidate in Manchester Withington, spent almost £10,000 more than her Lib Dem opponent, sitting MP John Leech, but lost out by almost 2,000 votes.

Ms Powell spent £36,714 compared to Mr Leech’s £27,761.

In Oldham East and Saddleworth, defeated Lib Dem candidate Elwyn Watkins spent £36,246 – only a few thousand pounds short of the maximum allowed. The Labour victor, Phil Woolas, spent a paltry £13,722 in comparison, including £81 on helium gas for balloons.

In Oldham West and Royton, winner Michael Meacher spent just £7,197, Lib Dem Mark Alcock spent £6,961 while Conservative Kamran Ghafoor spent £11,460 – £6,000 of which was his own money.

New Tory MP David Nuttall won Bury North, despite spending less than £13,000.

That compares with the £30,000 spent by Labour opponent, Maryam Khan, who was trying to retain the seat for the party after David Chaytor stepped down.

Mr Nuttall said: "Money spent in the few weeks before the election cannot compete with commitment and time spent in the constituency."

Cheadle appeared to be an exception to the rule as Conservative Ben Jeffreys spent £28,909 trying to claim Lib Dem Mark Hunter’s seat, but the MP hung on by 443 votes after spending £29,639.

Candidates have to submit details of their spending which are checked and held by local authorities. Anyone can apply to view them.

Political parties foot a large part of most candidates’ bills. A lot of the expenses detailed were notional – meaning a reasonable estimate of the cost of providing goods, services or time.

Some candidates also received donations from private individuals and trade unions. Tony Lloyd received £1,000 from Mr Bloxham, owner of developer Urban Splash, while Opal Property Group gave £2,500 in services.

He also received £1,500 from the Fire Brigades Union, £1,500 from the Amicus trade union and £2,000 from the GMB.

Unions also backed other Labour candidates. Leigh MP Andy Burnham received £1,000 from Unison and Yvonne Fovargue, who stood in Makerfield, was given £1,000 by Unite.

Lucy Powell received £200 from Amicus and Bury South MP Ivan Lewis was sent £600 from Unite.

David Henry, the Hazel Must Go Campaign candidate in Salford, received £500 each from the National Union of Rail, Maritime, and Transport Workers and the Respect Party.

He came sixth out of eight candidates as former government minister Hazel Blears won, spending £17,105 expenses in the process.

In Rochdale, Mr Rowen received £2,000 from the town’s former MP Sir Cyril Smith.

Across the region, candidates spent hundreds of pounds on election gimmicks including helium balloons, rosettes, badges and car stickers.

FLOWER power failed for a Labour candidate who shelled out £100 on red roses. Tom Ross, a Stretford ward councillor, bought the buttonholes during his £2,383 campaign in Altrincham and Sale West – but failed to unseat long-serving Conservative MP Graham Brady. His team wore the roses, from Altrincham’s Eaden flower shop, on election night.

HAZEL Blears’ election expenses were the highest in Salford. The former government minister spent £17,105 and won 16,655 votes, returning to Parliament for the fourth time. Her spending included £79 on helium for balloons and £21.25 on rosettes. Her biggest cost after leaflets was on the use of her party’s base on Langworthy Road.

LABOUR MP Andrew Gwynne spent £133 buying food for supporters who pounded the streets for him in the hours before polls opened. The Denton and Reddish MP used party funds for coffee, tea, milk, crisps, biscuits and cake from supermarkets and platters of food from Costco for party workers who had been canvassing for him.

MACCLESFIELD'S new Conservative MP David Rutley spent five times more than his nearest rival to hang on to the safe Tory seat - even putting up £1,000 of his own money. He spent £21,931, of the maximum £25,000 allowance, in the run-up to the election. The next biggest spender was independent candidate Brendan Murphy with £4,171.78.

  • Additional reporting by: Paul Britton, Dean Kirby, Bethan Dorsett, Neal Keeling, Tom Rowley, Chris Morris, Stuart Pike, Jennifer Williams, Peter Devine, Dan Thompson.

Comments

Login or Register to comment

i can vouch for the massive spending that elwyn watkins blew on his campaign! we had at least two or three leaflets a day for almost a month.
all usually spouting the same waffle about it being only a two horse race between liebour and the fib-dems.

funny that! the tories where not far behind this time! do we know what they spent? its not listed on here.

where did watkins £36k come from and who's paying for this?

Report This Reply

"Paying the high price for our democracy" This is a total joke only today on the news i see nick griffin from the bnp has been banned from bucks palace ? they looked for a petty excuse to ban the MP and they found it..DEMOCRACY WE DONT HAVE ONE......I dont vote for the BNP but i used to think we had a democracy where we had the right to voice our opinion.. how wrong ive been.

Report This Reply

This article is misleading.

No candidate could spend the thousands referred as there is a limit of about £11,500 per candidate for the main election campaign starting on 13th April when the Parliamentary campaign started. The additional money was expenditure from 1st January 2010 as from that date all expenditure had also to be recorded. This change in the law was introduced in response to the millions that were being poured into marginal constistuencies by Conservative Party, helped by large donations from such as Lord Ashcroft.

Report This Reply

What was the spending by the candidates in Manchester Gorton?

Report This Reply

£13,000? I guess the Tory billboards which covered the town weren't part of Nuttall's bill then.Timne and commitment? 8 years a PPC and I've never seen him here.

Report This Reply

Hazel Blears spent the most in Salford, but at least we knew who she was and what she stood for as she leafleted everywhee [four times for me] and did tour the constituency with her aides, knocking on doors. She arrived at my door to my surprise, as she was the first candidate or canvasser that I have ever been approaxched by in 45 years of voting. I had nothing from some candidates and had not a clue as to who they were or what they stood for.
I did not vote for ms Blears.

Report This Reply

The line "non of the spending involved tax-payers cash" sort of renders the story pointless. Still, I'd be interested to know which streets Andrew Gwynne's supporters "pounded" in the hours before polls opened. Having lived in two different parts of Denton all my life, and been eligible to vote for the last 30 years, I can honestly say I have NEVER been canvassed by Labour candidates - not that the two times I've been canvassed by the Tories counts as "democracy in action". Oh! and ironically, now that its now been taken over by the Tories, this last General Election was one of the few times, the LapDogs (sorry, LibDems) could even be bothered to leaflet the constituency.

Report This Reply

[quote name=Andy., Bury]£13,000? I guess the Tory billboards which covered the town weren't part of Nuttall's bill then.Timne and commitment? 8 years a PPC and I've never seen him here.[/quote]
He's lived and worked in the constituency all the time he's been a PPC. Just because you weren't interested in what he was doing doesn't mean that it wasn't observed and appreciated by most of the voters.

Report This Reply

[quote name=North Bury, Bury]
[quote name=North Bury, Bury]He's lived and worked in the constituency all the time he's been a PPC. Just because you weren't interested in what he was doing doesn't mean that it wasn't observed and appreciated by most of the voters.[/quote]Conversely, just because he wasn't interested in what was going on in the less affluent parts of the borough where he hasn't lived or worked. Who paid for those billboards which did find their way into the parts of the borough where the candidate was not seen to tread?

Report This Reply

These figures miss out national spending: any letters, leaflets, newspapers, posters etc.(or parts of them) that just talk about the national party and don't mention the local candidate get put on the national expenses. The parties all spent millions of pounds nationally, with the Conservatives spending the most.

Report This Reply