Health bosses have been ordered to slash spending plans for the NHS in Greater Manchester by almost ONE BILLION pounds.
The need for savings is expected to impact on ‘every aspect of health care' bringing job cuts and changes to services, the M.E.N. understands.
'Scale of health cuts is frightening'
Investment in the NHS has more than doubled since 1997, but massive national debt means that those increases cannot continue. Labour and the Conservatives have both pledged to increase health funding in line with inflation if they win the general election, but that will not keep up with the demand on the service caused by a growing and ageing population.
As a result regional health bosses have told Greater Manchester’s ten primary care trusts – the organisations which fund all health care in their area – that they must save £950m over the next four years.
It equates to five per cent of their annual budget of around £4.5bn and is more than it would cost to run one of the region's major hospitals for four years.
Nationally the government has warned health chiefs the NHS will have to save £15-20bn over four years.
The NHS budget for 2010-11 is just under £110bn. The health service now accounts for nearly one-third of all government spending.
The 'efficiency savings', which are outlined in several of Greater Manchester’s PCT board papers, will begin in April and must be made by 2014.
Bosses have been told to begin with a 30 per cut in management – prompting some PCTs to merge human resources, finance and other 'backroom' services with neighbouring health trusts.
Expensive
It is understood that other savings could be made through a reduction in lifestyle services such as IVF, weight loss surgery and gender reassignment.
But NHS bosses also want to cut the use of expensive emergency care A&E and 999 costs.
A spokesman for NHS North West said: “We are confident there will be no reduction in the NHS budget.
“We want to look at this from every possible angle and so will also be talking to the public about their role.
“We would like to reassure patients, the public and NHS staff that no targets have been set to 'cut' services or jobs. Individual trusts have been asked to start looking at how they can make services more productive, whilst continuing to improve the service offered from the NHS to patients.”
The M.E.N. understands that details of the first proposed savings to be identified include:
- A ten per cent cut in management jobs at Manchester PCT in 2010-12 with more to follow
- The merger of management teams at Salford Community Health services and Salford Royal Hospitals with a 30 per cent cut in managers
- And plans for Bury PCT to merge the management of community services - such as health centres, occupational therapy, family planning, district nurses - with Pennine Care Mental Health Trust to manage their community services.
Other PCTs are still working on their plans. It is understood they have asked the government for more guidance about what qualifies as a management job.
A spokesperson for NHS Manchester said: “The national NHS Operating Framework sets out the requirement for a 30 per cent reduction in PCT management costs over the next three years.
“This recognises the need for PCTs to be more efficient and ensure they are able to prioritise investment in frontline services.
The spokesman added: “Work is beginning to identify how we will deliver this requirement locally.”
'Scale of health cuts is frightening'
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
bobbydazzler (25/02/2010 at 11:49)
Belrock, England (25/02/2010 at 12:16)
Steve an alternative view (25/02/2010 at 12:24)
The PCT’s don’t need to ask the government for that its simple, its someone who works in the health system deligating responsibility to someone else for what they should be doing which results in them getting paid an obcene amount for doing nothing. Or to simplify it even more for those in the NHS that have dificulty understanding, any job that says ‘manager’in its title and pay packet
Rammylad (25/02/2010 at 12:27)
George Macduff (25/02/2010 at 12:28)
Ms B, Manchester (25/02/2010 at 12:34)
Mum's little sun beam, on her knee (25/02/2010 at 12:34)
Stevedore, Quayside (25/02/2010 at 12:35)
Tezza, Tyldesley (25/02/2010 at 12:35)
Well giving free car parking will certainly help wont it............. OH no it wont will it.
So all you who say that we should give free car parking where's the money going to come from? i'll tell you where from off the wards thats where
PW, Manchester (25/02/2010 at 12:41)
dessie, manchester (25/02/2010 at 12:43)
i completely agree with everything u say!!!
dickdasterdly, stockport (25/02/2010 at 12:44)
Mum's little sun beam, on her knee (25/02/2010 at 12:51)
I agree with several posters below about the NHS being used by people who aren't paying for it.
Bob Hope (25/02/2010 at 12:56)
Mum's little sun beam, on her knee (25/02/2010 at 13:07)
Knowledge Poverty, The Range (25/02/2010 at 13:15)
If people stop taking exercise through sport, then i don't need to explain or list the wide range of negative effects on health that would arise from that. Including ongoing long term palliative care mid and end life. Which is EXTREMELY expensive.
Far more expensive than fixing up a few sprains and strains and the odd broken ankle.
THINK before posting.
bufte, mcr (25/02/2010 at 13:29)
Almighty God, Salford - vote Green (25/02/2010 at 13:51)
Rob Wilson (25/02/2010 at 13:51)
Ignoramus, Manchester (25/02/2010 at 13:51)
thats what we do at the moment. People entitled for free healthcare receive it free, people who are not are charged. whether they pay or not isn't up to the NHS.
And I personally would rather treat someone who is ill rather than leave them to die outside a hospital.
Almighty God, Salford - vote Green (25/02/2010 at 13:54)
Knowledge Poverty, The Range (25/02/2010 at 14:01)
What is the money spent on 'immigrants' being spent on - that is wasteful?
Higgs Boson, Greater Manchester (25/02/2010 at 14:10)
So basically half the savings could be made by ourselves.
Mum's little sun beam, on her knee (25/02/2010 at 14:12)
If people gave up their obsession with eternal youth they would ide sooner, thus lifting the burden of all those old people eating my food and breathing my air.
"What is the money spent on 'immigrants' being spent on - that is wasteful?"
You know full well that the poster means utilising already stretched NHS resources on people other than those who have paid into the NHS for say 5 years. Not difficult.
Think before posting. Patronising attitudes don't cut it on here dear. And if you are trying to be clever, you are a long way behind Black Flag in the logic stakes.
Knowledge Poverty, The Range (25/02/2010 at 14:31)
No, you're wrong. If people gave up their obsession with - exercise - then they would indeed die younger. However, many would spend a proportion - years - of that life in palliative end of life care, which, and i've said this once already, but i'll say it again - is thousands of times more expensive than patching up a sprain and strain through their lives. Exercise is a good thing - your GP will confirm this for you.
No I don't. He didn't say anything about resources, or indeed anything else. He just said 'stop wasting money on immigrants'. That's like saying 'stop wasting money on gay people'. Are you actually his mum? Do you have to stick up for him?