Home | Education

Education

Angry reaction to 'no dyslexia' prof

AN EXPERT has provoked anger after questioning the scientific status of dyslexia.

Durham University's Professor of Education, Julian Elliott, argued that the term was largely an "emotional construct".

Campaigners condemned his comments, insisting that dyslexia is a "real condition" affecting millions of Britons.

Writing in the Times Educational Supplement, Professor Elliott described how he was "berated" by students after giving a lecture "questioning the scientific status of dyslexia".

"I recognised that an appeal to logic or science was insufficient," he said.

Construct

"Dyslexia persists as a construct largely because it serves an emotional, not a scientific, function."

Experts have failed to agree what it is, and being diagnosed as dyslexic makes virtually no difference to the treatment that the individual requires, he wrote.

Professor Elliott dismissed the commonly held view that dyslexics were more intelligent.

He said: "It is hardly surprising that the widespread, yet wholly erroneous, belief that dyslexics are intellectually bright but poor readers would create an impassioned demand to be accorded a dyslexic label."

Children's needs must continue to be addressed and their abilities must not be assessed purely on their literacy levels, he said.

"But we certainly don't need spurious diagnoses of dyslexia to achieve such ends."

'Little confidence'

After 30 years in the field he had "little confidence" in his ability - or the ability of others - to diagnose it, he said.

The British Dyslexia Association said his remarks were "inflammatory".

The charity's chief executive, Professor Susan Tresman, said educational psychologists or trained teachers had no problems spotting the condition.

She told the TES: "Dyslexia survives as a term because it is a real condition. I know of so many individual cases which completely refute what he is saying."

John Dunford, general secretary of the Secondary Heads Association, said the problem exists for thousands of people, whatever it is called.

"Dyslexia may or may not be the correct name for the problem," he said.

Suffered

"But there are undoubtedly many thousands of children and adults whose education has suffered as a result of their difficulty with word recognition.

"Rather than arguing about whether it exists, we need to find a way to cure it so that these sufferers are no longer so seriously disadvantaged."

Up to six million Britons are believed to suffer from the brain disorder that disrupts reading and writing.

Famous dyslexics include Sir Winston Churchill, Albert Einstein, Sir Richard Branson and Princess Beatrice, who recently spoke about her condition.

She had been struggling to read books that her younger sister, Eugenie, was managing.

Beatrice, 17, said last month that she wanted to use her position to help other people with dyslexia.

"That was one of the reasons that I came out publicly to let people know that I am dyslexic," she said.

"It was a problem that I know is helped by more people knowing about it."

Is dyslexia real? Have your say.

Comments

Login or Register to comment

I am lysdexic and have "daily sex". I am also good at anagrams.

Report This Reply

i was diagnosed with dyslexia at the age of 43, which came as a great shock. it was only after 2 of my children were diagnosed with dyslexia. i have learnt strategies to enable me to cope. how i have got to his age without knowing has been hard to think about. i always wondered why i couldn't keep anything in my head and had problems getting things to stay in my head when learning to drive. the idea that dyslexia doesn't exist, he's having a laugh he ought to try having it he would soon realise how hard life is when you suffer with it.

Report This Reply

Glad someone's had the guts to say it. It's just another term parents like to use to make their children 'special'. They're not poor readers, they're dyslexic. They're not naughty, they're Hyperactive. They're not smashing that bus shelter, they're expressing their individuality.

Surely no condition can be called a condition unless there is at least some scientific evidence it exists. If there is still no evidence whatsoever that dyslexia is anything other than poor reading, then they need to take a new route. Perhaps one encouraging parents to teach their children to read before they start school.

Report This Reply

One has to wonder if these conditions exist at all or are some type of excuse. Why is it that all these diseases suddenly came into being, but never existed 20, 30 years ago? Maybe the teaching method is faulty, and maybe the student is lazy. Woah! Can't say that now can we.

Report This Reply