A MANCHESTER headteacher, suspended on full pay for more than eight months, is appealing to council bosses to speed up their investigation so she can return to work.
Speaking publicly for the first time, Dame Jean Else told the M.E.N. how being "left in limbo" had been "hard to bear".
The Whalley Range High School for Girls head was made a dame for services to education in the 2001 Queen's New Years honours list, but was told to stay away in November after an inquiry was launched into how the school was run.
Dame Jean, her sister - finance manager Maureen Ratchford - and director of governance Stewart Scott were suspended on full pay at a cost believed to be in excess of £300,000.
She breaks her silence today to reveal that she felt the three had been treated "unprofessionally".
Dame Jean said: "I have kept quiet in the hope it would be dealt with, but now I feel it can't go on any longer. I would like the council to reach a fair and professional conclusion as soon as possible enabling me to get back.
"Whalley Range has been a commitment for 10 years and I don't want to see it go into decline. To be left in this limbo has been hard to bear."
Unacceptable
Her pleas have been backed by David Hart, general secretary of the National Association of Headteachers. He said: "I think the delay is totally unacceptable. I would like to see her back at the beginning of the new academic year.
"It seems everything she achieved on behalf of the school, with the support of her staff, has been ignored."
The eight-month investigation into the running of the school was prompted by a draft report by the Audit Commission, which is believed to have raised concerns relating to staffing, employment practices, interviews and contracts at the school.
That inquiry began in 2002 after three members of staff - two non-teaching - made claims of unfair dismissal. All three of the complaints were settled without liability by the local education authority.
Dame Jean is prevented from commenting on the specific issues raised, but she does not believe they warrant the actions taken by the authority.
She said: "The few issues that have been picked up have been procedural and could apply in any school."
Dame Jean condemned speculation that it would be impossible for her to return to her job. She said: "I am really fighting to go back. I think it's sad after all this time working for Manchester that we have all been treated so unprofessionally."
Council officials and the suspended staff have responded to the Audit Commission's draft report and are waiting for the publication of the final report. A spokesman for the commission said: "We have received several responses to our draft report which require careful consideration and, in some cases, further inquiries.
"Our over-riding aim is to make sure all information is carefully considered and the final outcome is fair."
A spokesman for the council said: "We are conducting a thorough and detailed investigation which is progressing as quickly as possible. Throughout this inquiry the interests of the pupils have been paramount, and we have put arrangements in place to maintain continuity at the school."
But the council's Liberal Democrat spokeswoman on education, Coun Alison Firth said: "Parents are anxious for the situation to be resolved. This is obviously costing the school money and I think it could create a period of unsettlement and uncertainty and what I want is stability for the school."
Should Dame Jean be able to return to school? Have your say or cast a vote below.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 9 and replies | View All
A colleague, Manchester (05/08/2005 at 12:37)
Whatever Jean is accused of doing wrong during her reign at Whalley Range didn't affect the school in any negative way. Students achieving 5 or more GCSE's went from 18% in 96 to 50%+ the last 3 years. There are signs that results have been affected - both the Maths and Science Key Stage 3 results have shown a fall of 6 - 8% this year.
It will be interesting to see what the GCSE pass rate will be for this year...
a member of the support staff, manchester (05/08/2005 at 15:59)
how can someone who has been awarded a dameship for her work in education be treated so badly
lets hope someone high up realises what a grave mistake has been made and demands her immediate return .so whalley range high can once again offer the students and staff the excellent leadership they have grown to expect,as the saying goes "you dont know what you have untill its gone "
as we are not allowed any contact with Dame Jean i would like to send her this message from all "dont let them grind you down fight to the end without you there would be no home of excellence whalley range is dame jean else "
anonymous, manchester (05/08/2005 at 17:50)
member of staff, manchester (08/08/2005 at 20:42)
A very concerned employee
Barbara Snelling, Wales (08/08/2005 at 21:39)
Shealgh Fitzsimmons, Manchester (09/08/2005 at 19:16)
I do not know what the end result will be, I have written to Tony Blair, Ruth Kelly and other people to no avail, just a brief acknowledgement has been received They scream education, education, but really do they just want our votes. They obviously do not think it is important for inner city children to receive the same standard of education as their own children, if they did they would have acted upon the information I sent them.
As stated previously, I do not know what the outcome will be but, I do know that Dame Jean would be heart broken to see the deterioration within the school.
Looking on the bright side, I have no job now, but I can now contact someone I hold very dear and have the greatest amount of respect for all of her achievements which have been solely to benefit children.
a concerned person, manchester (13/08/2005 at 13:40)
Justine Williams, Justine@willia48.freeserve.co.uk (13/08/2005 at 14:33)
When are Council officials and LEA's officers held to account for wasting valuable resources to witch hunt headteachers publicly. Who audits the Authority and the LEAs regards the costs of such witch hunts?
When I tried to have Trafford LEA District audited in 2003/04 with regards to their unsuccessful witch hunt of Denis Sweeney, headteacher of Lostock Community High School, Stretford, (1997-2002) who had been suspended on full pay for 13 months, I was told that the Authority's accounts were now closed and that they District Auditor was not minded to re-open the books b" so how much money was wasted to destroy a man's professional reputation and damage a community? Much needed money that should have been spent on the pupils and the school and not to keep a good professional from doing his job.
It is shameful that Dame Jean Else, Maureen Rochford and Stewart Scott are still suspended on full pay after some 8 months. What is the real cost here? What is the human cost? What exactly did they do to deserve their untimely and public removal from Whalley High... did they run away with the kitty? Did they molest a child or a member of staff? Did they behave so grossly unprofessionally as to merit this exposure and punishment? NO, it seems that Jean Else is guilty (of something?) until proven innocent b" surely that is a travesty of English Justice. Why is it taking Manchester Authority/LEA so long to adjudge the situation and bring it to a close? Or is the real reason that success (nationally recognised) that undoubtedly was Jean Else's, had to be punished rather than rewarded. Why are authorities frightened of innovative and creative hardworking achievers in education? I would have thought that these positive attribute in a head were exactly those to be furthered b" for what is education, if not that it pushes and supports pupils to become autonomous and responsible adults b" our future.
Did Manchester Authority take a leave out of Trafford LEA's book when they started their witch hunt of Jean Else? The suspension and treatment of Jean Else, as was that of Denis Sweeney (2001-2002) is none other than corporate bullying. The elongated and protracted process employed has no other purpose than to demoralise the individual as well as again and again moving the goalpost in an attempt to find a 'wrongdoing' and until they (the Authority) can make 'something' stick.
Shameful! When will it stop?
Having been involved with education for over 30 years b" I am saddened that again and again the sound bite 'education, education, education,' is meaningless when a Local Authority is hell bent on destroying good individuals who really care for our children.
Local Authorities and LEAs seem to be a law on to themselves. Can we stop them? I wrote a book on Denis Sweeney's and my experience at the hand of the LEA officers and the politicians in Trafford. - TILTING AT WINDMILLS b" a scenario not unlike the one which is currently affecting Jean Else. I am glad Jean has spoken up. The fear and loneliness experienced when in such a situation is absolutely awful and inhuman. I wish more people would speak up to protect the rights of teaching staff and heads and support the pupils and their community.
www.bullyonline.co.uk deals with many cases of bullying of teachers and heads by authorities as does my book 'Tilting at Windmills' which can be directly purchased (B#8) from Berwick Press, 17 Berwick Avenue, Urmston, Manchester M41 9QS b" 0161 865 1733. www.berwickpress.com
I hope Jean Else will be allowed to get back to her school soon to continue the good work she started.
Justine Williams
PJB, Salford (19/09/2005 at 17:23)