A SCHOOL has achieved its best-ever attendance levels - thanks to a scheme which gives pupils the chance to win electronic gadgets if they turn up for classes.
Pupils at St Peter's RC High School, in Longsight, can win MP3 players, digital cameras, WH Smith vouchers worth '1,500 and a home PC.
Since introducing the "Turn Up, Tune In" scheme last November, headteacher John McNerney says attendance levels have hit a high of 90 per cent.
More than 8 per cent of pupils are still absent, which is higher than the national average of nearly 7 per cent. But St Peter's figures are good for a school with a large numbers of deprived pupils.
Incentives
St Peter's joined forces with Aria Technology to offer the incentives to tackle low attendance, low achievement and low employment among inner city youngsters.
At its introduction, Mr McNerney said he was preparing his pupils, many of whom truant with their parents' consent, for the demands of the workplace. This week he said: "It's now cool to be in school for the overwhelming majority of our pupils.
"Over the last 12 months we have reduced absenteeism by a third. This is a major achievement - especially when truancy remains such a high profile national concern, despite government efforts to reduce it."
Despite the positive effect on results, some believe the scheme sets a bad example to youngsters. Nick Seaton, spokesman for the Campaign for Real Education, said: "I think it is giving young people completely the wrong message. It's suggesting they have to have some kind of expensive, special reward to behave normally.
"I can't see any sensible employer thinking much of a youngster who will only go to work if they are offered a digital camera."
Should pupils be rewarded simply for attending school? Have your say.
by Chris OsuhJOHN MCNERNEY: It's cool to be in schoolTweet

Showing comments 1 to 4 and replies | View All
Rik, Folkestone (13/05/2005 at 11:05)
Parents should be more vigilent to what their children are doing and make sure they are at school and not bunking off. Then there would be no need for all these "electronic extras" as bribes.
Will they expect to get the same electronic gadgets when they enter the real world of work? I hope not.
Sue, Cheshire (13/05/2005 at 14:50)
Nigel Norman, North Derbyshire (13/05/2005 at 21:20)
Who is funding this? I suspect I am as a tax Payer. But my taxes do NOT go towards My sons University education nor even his housing as a student and yet a kid leaving school with no intention of lifting a finger to legally support himself will be eligible for housing benefit. Talk about sending the wrong signal. Can we not support it by fining the kids that still truant and if they haven't got the money now set up a loan for them like they do for the hard working kids that get to university. No that would not be fare but neither is setting our good kids a loan to pay off before they can set up their own home.
lesley harmston, utah u.s.a. (15/05/2005 at 18:29)