SCHOOL dinners could become a thing of the past - because the Government has failed to support changes demanded by Jamie Oliver.
Pupils have rejected the healthy hot meals inspired by the naked chef and are choosing fattening junk food instead.
School dinner halls were "like restaurants with no customers", meal service provider the Local Authority Caterers Association (LACA) warned.
In a letter to Education Secretary Ed Balls, LACA said soaring food costs had contributed to the problem.
And it warned the school meals service was nearing collapse.
"The majority of school meal providers are now running at a deficit which they will not be able to sustain," the letter said.
"The Government has acted on the changes Jamie Oliver recommended but it has not provided sufficient support to make it work," LACA vice chairman Neil Porter said.
"He made them recognise how under-funded the school meals service was and the Government provided money over a three year period to make improvements - but nowhere near enough.
"And until the school-meal culture changes within the schools the problem will remain.
"Kids don't like the new healthy hot meals and they are voting with their feet."
LACA argued that only a massive injection of money and a change in the law could save the school meals service.
"Pupils should not have the choice to go outside at lunchtime and spend their money outside the school," Mr Porter said.
"Otherwise the changes that are being made will not work. At the moment school dinner halls are like restaurants with no customers. More emphasis has been placed on better nutritional standards but the pupils do not like it.
"In order to maintain and achieve what we are trying to do with the school meals service we have got to reduce the choice available to them."
The letter to Mr Balls made six recommendations to save school dinners.
It recommended that by 2017 each pupil should eat a healthy and 'climate friendly' meal once a day, that a set period of time should be put aside for the meal so that it was a part of the curriculum, and that a minimum of £1 should be spent per pupil per school on each meal.
School kitchen workers should be paid to work sufficient hours to prepare food from fresh ingredients, each pupil should by the age of 14 receive 12 hours a year of cookery lessons, and they should also be given direct experience of food growing and production.
It said the full package of improvements would cost £291 million a year.
What do you think? Have your say.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 9 and replies | View All
Lawrence Glendinning (23/06/2008 at 15:55)
The £291m is too expensive for them? But the Goverment can find countless billions to rage wars on two fronts?!
Guten Tag (23/06/2008 at 16:13)
Karney for head of GMPTA(formerly MC Spanner) (23/06/2008 at 16:30)
Find a publicity hungry celebrity
Chuck no money at it by just quoting the current cost of school dinners
Don't follow through with the project
Create a Quango
Allow the celebrity to make a packet on the back of that plan.
Chuck no money at it by reannouncing the same lack of money you didn't spend in the first place.
Give MBE to celeb and Knighthood to Quango "Czar"
A 8 point guide to New Labour politics
Bernstein's Motorbike [AKA Scrotnig], Gorton (23/06/2008 at 16:37)
How very Nu-Lab!
I can see the army of "school meals wardens" issuing fixed penalty notices that the parent have to pay within 28 days or face prison sentences.
Remember where you read it first!
Datum (23/06/2008 at 17:06)
ace, manchester (23/06/2008 at 23:45)
LookingForLogic, Stockport (24/06/2008 at 00:09)
As a PAYING parent, I would expect a good healthy balance/choice of food at lunchtime, think I'll stick to packed lunches for now, My kids school have implemented their own "healthy eating" rules which exclude a lot of lunchtime goodies & break-time snacks, yet the breakfast/brunch club still SELL the kids white bread smothered in MARGARINE, not wholemeal/seeded/mix bread, not real butter, yet they will not allow my kids to eat home-packed foods if they are classed as 'unhealthy'?
Parents need to know their kids are getting the right food during the day, some schools have already proven that hot foods can be provided for minimum cost, which are still healthy 'low GI' options. How hard can it be to implement this in schools? If I thought My kids would be given a better option for their lunches I would gladly put them on school meals, I'd also be happy to give a couple of hours each week for nothing to improve the school meals system, rather than them ( the schools) making it up themselves without any real knowledge of what is best for the kids.
Anthony, Accrington,Lancashire (24/06/2008 at 07:22)
Timberman, MANCHESTER (24/06/2008 at 08:20)
Cross these rings going outside school to eat and you are charged. This money could then be spent on improving school meals.
Only joking honest, this idea is as stupid and as unfair as that other c-charge.