Three conmen tricked a pensioner with Alzheimer’s disease out of £40,000.
They targeted the 79-year-old victim at his home in Stockport posing as builders.
After turning up univited on his doorstep, they told him that work needed to be done to his house.
He handed over four cheques totalling £39,800 – the cash has never been recovered.
The scam only came to light when the victim’s daughter raised questions.
In March 2008, she noticed three debits from his bank account. Believing that they may be for genuine work she waited for the builders to return to do the driveway.
The little work that had been carried out on the property in Marple, was sub-standard and it took the victim £2,900 to put right.
At Minshull Street Crown Court, Tyson Price, Ashley Wilson, and Karl Taylor, all pleaded guilty to converting criminal property.
Speaking after the case, Mark Kellett, Crown Prosecution Service lawyer, said: “The exploitation
of this elderly gentleman, who was 79 years of age and suffering from dementia, by Tyson Price, Ashley Wilson and Karl Taylor is truly despicable.
“However, let today’s sentence be a message for those who think nothing of taking advantage of the vulnerable: justice will find you and, when it does, it will be you who pays the price.”
Mr Kellett added: “Under the Proceeds of Crime Act the authorities will pursue criminals.
“Whatever assets these defendants have will be recovered and returned to their victim.”
Wilson, 23, and Taylor, 22, both of Quantock Place, Winsford, Cheshire, were both sentenced to nine months in prison,
suspended for two years.
They were also ordered to do 150 hours unpaid work.
Price, 19, of no fixed abode, but who has links to Yorkshire, was ordered to carry out 150 hours of unpaid work and was made the subject of a 12-month community order.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 22 and replies | View All
MUFC is my religion S.A.F is my god, Manchester (04/09/2010 at 07:29)
the monkey, bolton (04/09/2010 at 09:03)
open to all the scams going on.
Ken Clark (04/09/2010 at 09:10)
Salford72, Salford (04/09/2010 at 09:44)
Jokerman, Atlantis (04/09/2010 at 10:35)
“Whatever assets these defendants have will be recovered and returned to their victim.”
So what good will that do? One has no fixed abode so that leaves a few copys of Big Issue.
These lowlife scum should be in prison.
Cameron Dean (04/09/2010 at 11:16)
Stark warning there - criminals are now shaking in their boots unless they read on.......
" both sentenced to nine months in prison, suspended for two years. "
So I can scam a vulnerable old man out of all his savings, spend it, get caught, plead guilty at court, and walk free..... Oh yes - I am paying the price alright.
HOW MANY TIMES????!!!!!
Scrutineer, Middleton (04/09/2010 at 12:03)
They might have got away without a prison sentence, but their friends, family and neighbours will all know what a sick thing they have done and will hopefully let them know that their sort are not welcome.
derek jones (06/09/2010 at 10:03)
Englisc Stanas, North Manchester (04/09/2010 at 13:27)
suspended for two years. Suspended brilliant!
Jordy, Middleton (04/09/2010 at 15:16)
fed up with it, sale (04/09/2010 at 16:00)
hogg, rochdale (04/09/2010 at 17:10)
sugar ray wythenshawe (04/09/2010 at 19:05)
alex bowen (04/09/2010 at 19:41)
Why no pictures of this vermin..? Let their mugshots be plastered all over so we all know what they look like if they ever come calling on some other poor sod, and come calling they will, because that laughable sentence was no deterrent, whatever Mark Kellet says.
flackblag, England (04/09/2010 at 21:53)
Mark Ashy, Detroit MI (04/09/2010 at 22:15)
I know the average person wants a big increase, and definite minimum sentence for certain things, things that the judges just keep on getting wrong without rhyme or reason. We vote our judges on a local level ( and magistrates & state judges) every 4 years in the US. It keeps them doing the peoples justice, as corny as it sounds.
A judge and prosecutor will be practicing law for themselves (voted out) very soon if they are not perceived to be tough on crime. His actions are what they use to judge them, everything is public record, no hiding bent coppers like the one with the drug dealing book from Bolton last month.
The letter of the law is followed and should be for some crimes of theft or violence against the vulnerable. It is really the moral obligation of us all to expect society to protect the vulnerable, even if we do not actively participate in trying to see this is the case.
We will all probably be vulnerable to this at some point in our lives. A part of this is random, as far as who comes knocking on your door when you are old and inclined to give people the benefit of the doubt, very sad & scary.
I know that many people in the UK feel fed up wit the way the justice system is going, it should be overhauled (sentencing guidelines added at least) as a part of one party's political agenda, it would be a vote getter.
I bet we see and hear these 3 winners grace these ages again in the years to come. The old bill will probably have them under scrutiny I hope after this, unless they have jobs then I will bet that they are grafting somewhere else on other unsuspecting vulnerable people, it is what they do, bullying scumbags.
london sucks, the green side of manchester (05/09/2010 at 10:42)
Blue Moon3 (05/09/2010 at 09:34)
cashback (05/09/2010 at 15:36)
derek jones (06/09/2010 at 10:01)
Dzenko, Manchester United (06/09/2010 at 14:40)
wagepacket1, u.k. (07/09/2010 at 18:47)
smile smirth (08/09/2010 at 20:08)
dave moore (09/09/2010 at 13:36)