TORY leader David Cameron has told business leaders in Manchester that he found the Pre-Budget Report `shocking, unconvincing and depressing'.
Mr Cameron, speaking at a
Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce
dinner at the city's Midland Hotel last night (Monday), said he found the level of government borrowing after 14 years of economic growth shocking.
"This year it's £78bn, next year it will be £118bn - a record level of borrowing. A year after that it will be £105bn. We are going to double the national debt in five years.
The interest on the debt is going to be the fastest-growing part of public sector spending, more than on education, policing, the NHS."
Mr Cameron said he was unconvinced that the reduction in VAT would trigger more high street spending.
The depressing aspect of the Pre-Budget Report was, he said, the highly political nature of the measures. With VAT coming down for a year but rises in income tax for high earners and increased National Insurance contributions looming in 2011, the Conservative leader said the PBR `marched to a political timetable rather than an economic one'.
Depressing
Future tax rises would `act like a drag anchor' to the country's economic recovery. They signalled the end of having tax rates to encourage enterprise, entrepreneurship and effort.
The lack of available credit was the biggest hurdle faced by businesses, and more effective measures would have been a six-month VAT holiday, National Insurance reductions for small firms and tax breaks for companies which give jobs to unemployed people.
Mr Darling today defended his £1trillion gamble to drag Britain out of recession, insisting that he was doing the `right thing' to support the economy.
Mr Darling said it would have been wrong to walk away and leave people to `sink or swim', as he faced questioning over yesterday's Pre-Budget Report, which is designed to kick-start the struggling economy with a £20bn boost.
"It seems only the Conservatives who are saying - as they did in the 1980s and the 1990s - `Just walk away from people, leave them high and dry, let them sink or swim'," he told GMTV.
"I just do not think that is the right thing to do. People expect the government to help them. We will be helping people, and I fully intend to see that through."
"Of course, we have got to live within our means, so I have also had to take difficult decisions, though I think it is the fair way to do it, to ensure we get that borrowing back down again," he said.
"People (who earn) over £100,000 will actually be paying more - I make no bones about that, in three years' time, when the changes come through.
"But I believe that it is the right thing to do, to support our economy now but at the same time make sure that as a country, we live within our means."
Governor of the Bank of England Mervyn King today backed the Pre-Budget Report, saying the measures seemed ‘perfectly reasonable’ given the ‘extraordinary circumstances’. But he warned there was a ‘long hard road ahead’.
Business leaders split on Pre-Budget Report
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 3 and replies | View All
Jay B, oldham (25/11/2008 at 09:21)
stop making it financially attractive to have kids when you cannot afford to!!
the greatest form of child neglect of abuse is people who cannot afford to have a child having them to get benefits!
you're basically forcing a child into poverty. from day one!
scrap benefits!!
get people back to work!
then they'll all have money to spend!
and the government will have money to spend on public sevices and projects because they havent spent our taxes we've paid in on all the benefits scoungers claiming!!
then your police, nhs and even your public transport might improve!! after all if you work you pay for this to be done! and it isnt!
oh and we wouldnt be £500bn more in debt too!
i bet we're more in debt poverty now than the likes of africa and other developing countries!
greychat, middleton (25/11/2008 at 14:04)
If you have worked all your life the old age pension is what has been put into the economy over a lifetime.
A budget give away of 14 - 20 Billion? or what ever they are claiming.
The Government can only give back to the tax payer by refunding their own money. Reducing taxes or VAT only means the Government is not TAKING as much.
Governments hold the taxpayers money on trust to administer services for the whole population.
How many responsible people upto their limit on their credit card would get another card and double or treble their debt in a year?
This is what Gordon Brown in the guise of Alistar Darling is doing without the voters having any say in the matter.
With this Governments past debt and their future projected debt, future generations will be lumbered with high taxes for decades.
self_loading_frieght, sale (25/11/2008 at 22:19)