THE Bank of England today slashed interest rates by one and a half per cent to 3 per cent – the lowest rate since 1955.
The shock cut is the biggest single rate cut since 1981, and comes as the country faces up to the prospect of a deep recession.
Richard Lambert, director-general of the CBI, said: “Business and consumer confidence has been deteriorating sharply in recent months, and recession has replaced inflation as the major threat to the economy over the next year or two,” he said.
"This should help to ease conditions in the credit markets and allow banks to pass on the benefits to their customers.”
Ilona Krohn, principal economic advisor at Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce, said: “This is an unusually large cut and it reflects the unusual economic conditions we are in. We have to keep in mind, however, that so far banks have not passed on the last interest rate cuts and the action might take longer than usual to take effect.”
David McKeith, north west senior partner at accountancy firm PricewaterhouseCoopers, said rates had needed to come down to three per cent or lower to prepare the economy for a recovery.
Today’s cut should help people on tracker mortgages pegged to the Bank’s base rate.
For those on standard variable rates the cut should knock more than £100 a month off the cost of a £150,000 mortgage.
But there are fears lenders will be reluctant to pass on reductions in full to other borrowers.
Chief Secretary to the Treasury Yvette Cooper said ministers expect banks to pass on the cuts as rapidly as possible after shoring up the finances of several major players with taxpayers' cash.
“The Government has stepped in to make the banking system safe, to support the banks. It is right now that the banks do their bit to support everybody else,” she said.
Shadow chancellor George Osborne said: “This is a shot in the arm for the economy, but it shows how sick the patient is.”
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 22 and replies | View All
Rt Hon Dr Rev MC Spanner MP QC FCA FRICS JP OK (06/11/2008 at 12:14)
Trumpetman21 (06/11/2008 at 13:02)
Bean B4, manchester (06/11/2008 at 13:13)
Paul in Manchester, Manchester (06/11/2008 at 13:31)
Rt Hon Dr Rev MC Spanner MP QC FCA FRICS JP OK (06/11/2008 at 13:40)
Jay B, oldham (06/11/2008 at 13:56)
the banks still wont pass on the savings yet they'll go and cut your savings rate straight away.
Marc (06/11/2008 at 14:15)
Bean, do you want to invest in my new line of empty beer cans?
Octavius Tinsworth Ace (06/11/2008 at 14:52)
Jay B, oldham (06/11/2008 at 15:08)
Octavius Tinsworth Ace (06/11/2008 at 15:28)
Emjay See (06/11/2008 at 15:46)
Are the interest rates going to produce a feel good factor in time for the next election? If so is that their main purpose?
Interesting also to compare and contrast the Tory do-nothing response of Major and co to the last recession and the Brown, pull all the levers and try to inject some life into the ailing economy approach.
The tory approach is akin to being iin a storm at sea take your hand off the wheel and see where the wind blows you, even it is the rocks (let the market decide, you can't buck the market, you can't spend your way out of a recession)
Vs
Bank bail out, interest rate cuts, international co-operation and reform of the money markets, Keynsian spend on public projects to stimulate demand/maintain jobs and tax revenues/reduce unemployment benefit. I.e work like stink and try to sail into calmer waters as quickly as possible
On paper I much prefer the second approach but only if it works!
citycentre, manchester (06/11/2008 at 15:47)
trackers are usually linked to the bank of england rate, so banks have to pass on any cut (or increase) if you have one
but they are difficult to secure now
variable rate would either be the banks svr or something based on it (discounted rates) the banks set these and they do not have to cut them in relation to the bank of england rate
Ewan Oosami, Halifax (06/11/2008 at 16:15)
What will happen immediately is that they'll cut the rate for savers as always.
How do they think this will release more money into the marketplace? Those with mortgages if they have any sense, and are able to, should keep their payments the same. The pensioners who rely on income from savings will not have as much to spend. Idiotic move just because America did it.
citycentre, manchester (06/11/2008 at 16:24)
the circumstances were somewhat different in the last recession, for one the banks were not in danger of failing, and if they were i suspect major/lamont would have had to have taken action
as it was they were not doing nothing, rather attempting to maintain the pounds value as part of the ERM, leading to double digit interest rates, which were cut as soon as the effort was adandoned
so the recession was consumer led as higher interest rates caused a slump in spending; now its banking led as we have become used to/dependent on cheap, easy credit
with the banks badly overstretched this has now been withdrawn, meaning existing debt cant be serviced and new loans are nor available or expensive
Emjay See (06/11/2008 at 16:44)
That is how they got us into recession (amongst other things)
Once we were in it what did they do? (Can't buck the markets)
You have to admit the 2 approaches have been very different I guess history will judge which approach is the more successful
Ewan Oosami, Halifax (06/11/2008 at 17:55)
citycentre, manchester (06/11/2008 at 19:40)
going into the ERM at the wrong time (interest rates too high and german interest rates rising following reunifictaion) probably contributed, as did the surge in house prices (some parralels there),as you say
The Horse, Cheadle (06/11/2008 at 22:10)
Jay B, oldham (07/11/2008 at 10:11)
the banks had run out of money so the government had to step in and bail them out.
and now the interest rate gets dropped to encourage borrowing again.
but all the borrowing is the reason we got into this mess?
all this is done is put the economic crash which could have happend in the next few weeks off now to a few months or a year or so.
what happens when the banks run dry again?
there wont be much left to do a second bail out.
Emjay See (07/11/2008 at 20:20)
you (or I or anyone) might hope that the banks only lend to people with a reasonable chance or repaying the loan this time around.
I sometimes find living in a fantasy world is better as you might hold onto your sanity.
Anyway here's hoping.
citycentre, manchester (09/11/2008 at 18:42)
the profit motive dosnt lead to long term thinking
punterpride (09/11/2008 at 19:06)