Argent, who have been chosen to redevelop Elizabeth House at St Peter's Square, say they plan to do for the square what they have started to do for the Piccadilly area.
Improvements to the square, to transport, and to neighbouring roads including Mosley Street are promised as part of a wider plan to upgrade what was once the city's commercial heart.
A partnership involving local businesses and landlords - much like the Piccadilly Partnership created by Argent and Bruntwood five years ago - is to lead the effort.
Argent chief executive David Partridge, speaking exclusively to the M.E.N., explained how Argent, which has been behind the multi-million-pound regeneration of Piccadilly Gardens and the area close to Piccadilly Station, will tackle St Peter's Square.
"In many ways St Peter's Square is so much better located than anything else we've done. Although it is a bit run-down, it is brilliant for transport and perhaps not as run-down as some of the areas we've already ventured into in Manchester, London and Birmingham," he said.
Opportunity
"It's a real opportunity to do something with neighbouring landowners around St Peter's Square and Mosley Street, an area which is sadly neglected in Manchester. It was the traditional heart of the city, but it is run-down and whilst some developers have already begun to work in the area, we want to use our redevelopment of Elizabeth House to spearhead improvement in the area and use it to prompt a big re-think of the entire area for transport, pedestrians and businesses."
Argent's bid for Elizabeth House beat rival proposals from Development Securities, Miller Developments and Standard Life. The Greater Manchester Property Venture Fund, which owns the building, selected Argent after interviews. In March the fund will consider proposals to make a detailed planning application.
Nicholas Whipp, partner at GVA Grimley, which has been advising the fund on the future of Elizabeth House, said: "This will be a landmark decision for the core of Manchester and is another sign of the vital regeneration of the central area. Subject to planning, a building in excess of 350,000 sq ft could be located on the site, giving floorplates upwards of 25,000 sq ft in what is now regarded as the prime core of the city.
"The building will fall in with the regeneration of St Peter's Square and the important civic buildings of the town hall and Central Library. It is envisaged that the building will be available by 2011."
Argent are behind the massive redevelopment of London's Kings Cross, as well as working at Manchester Piccadilly.
What do you think? Have your say.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 15 and replies | View All
Mark, South Manchester (29/01/2008 at 10:36)
And now the same firm is going to redevelop St Peter's Square??
When it comes to architecture, other UK cities are now demanding the best and getting it right - while Manchester just doesn't seem to care!
Secret Squirrel (29/01/2008 at 13:05)
Jimc (29/01/2008 at 13:17)
What mess a re they going to make of St peters square.
Why dont they turn Elizabeth House into, wait for it.
Yes you guessed it more apartments.
Octavius Tinsworth Ace (29/01/2008 at 13:29)
I agree the redevelopment of Piccadilly Gardens was a catastrophe. However, I quite like what Argent have done at Piccadilly Place.
jomov, Manchester (29/01/2008 at 13:35)
Secret Squirrel (29/01/2008 at 15:13)
dog hardy, manchester (29/01/2008 at 22:25)
Fran M, Stockport (30/01/2008 at 00:47)
Octavius Tinsworth Ace (30/01/2008 at 09:41)
Dog Hardy: I agree totally about the green spaces but I feel generally you're being a little harsh on Manchester. Personally, I'm proud of how the vast majority of the city centre looks these days (Piccadilly Gardens and St Peter's Square aside) and whenever I've brought visitors to the city they are always impressed with the place, especially those that haven't been to Manchester for twenty years or so. (I think it's easy for residents to forget what things were really like back then.)
The Bobelesque (30/01/2008 at 09:55)
I bet the design includes congestion charge-friendly features 'just in case' we finish up with the charge being implemented.
Mark, South Manchester (30/01/2008 at 11:08)
Yes and the point now is, that those same perpetrators have just been given the job to redevelop St Peter's Square!!
Piccadilly Gardens was a massive, massive, massive "missed opportunity" for Manchester - no doubt St Peter's Square now will be too??
Octavius Tinsworth Ace (30/01/2008 at 12:00)
I do think their work on Piccadilly Place, on the other hand, is very good and has completely transformed the whole impression you get of the city when exiting Piccadilly Station, which frankly used to be rather a bleak one.
So, based on that, I'd rather give them the benefit of the doubt and at least wait to see their plans before I chase them out of town with pitchforks and burning torches.
David, Manchester (30/01/2008 at 13:02)
toasting, bury (16/02/2009 at 13:00)
St. Peters square already has a couple of fine buildings on its edge (Central Library and The Midland). Do we think they'll really develop Elisabeth House with an appropriate quality?
citycentre, manchester (18/02/2009 at 13:38)