Kellogg's, which employs 1,000 people at two Manchester sites, says the charge would make life too hard for its staff and too difficult to ship cereals from its Trafford Park plant.
Trafford Centre owners Peel Holdings is already firm opponents of the road pricing proposals, and Kellogg's stance will be a boost to the `no' campaign.
The US-owned cereal giant believes that several other big companies are ready to make a stand.
Communications director chief Chris Wermann said the company `welcomed' the proposals to invest £3bn in Greater Manchester's public transport infrastructure, but added: `they will not help us move cornflakes'.
The bid for funds from the government's Transport Innovation Fund, revealed exclusively by the M.E.N. a year ago, has been so hasty that the leaders have not yet consulted Kellogg's and other companies in Trafford Park, Kellogg's said.
"They said they would talk to us and we had been on their list of people to talk to. But how can you put a bid in without consulting businesses the size of ours?
See our interactive traffic map and take part in our traffic survey.
"This is the first time we have spoken out but we will be more vocal from now on. There are a number of other big businesses who will be doing the same," Mr Wermann added,
The company, which opened at Trafford Park in 1938 and makes more than 40 different cereals, last month moved to reassure staff that its investment in a state-of-the art factory in Poland does not sound the death-knell for its manufacturing force on Trafford Park.
The announcement of the Polish factory had sparked fears from staff about the future, particularly as more than 200 jobs have been lost over the last 18 months as part of an efficiency review.
And today he stressed: "This decision about congestion charging has no implications for the future of our Manchester factory or the head office."
e said both the plant and the Old Trafford-based head office are on the edge of what is likely to be the inner charging zone.
"No-one has been prepared to commit where the lines are going to be drawn. But wherever it is, there will be a significant impact on our employees."
He revealed the company's opposition after hearing that businesses in Greater Manchester will have to wait for the government to say `yes' to congestion charging before they will get to know exactly how much it will cost them.
See our interactive traffic map and take part in our traffic survey.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
shayla (22/01/2008 at 08:27)
It's just another way to get money out of people who work for a living.
Since people are stopping smoking now, lessening the bills to the National Health service, they need to get the money they're missing from somewhere.
Munkey Boy, Audenshaw, Manchester (22/01/2008 at 09:23)
Besides, isn't there even a new Metrolink stop proposed in TIF just near their building to help their staff get to work?
Kiwi-blue, Christchurch NZ (22/01/2008 at 11:17)
Mark,Radcliffe. (22/01/2008 at 11:27)
Chris, Irlam (22/01/2008 at 12:00)
That is why most people who can see past the end of their nose know this Toll Tax is a very bad idea all-round.
Phase 2 ring any bells?
Sid (22/01/2008 at 12:06)
Simon B, www.manchestertolltax.com (22/01/2008 at 12:22)
The amount they produce and receive, it has to be.
Its one of the biggest food factorys in Europe.
The Bobelesque (22/01/2008 at 12:28)
Well done Kellogg for thinking of its workers.
Munkey Boy, Audenshaw, Manchester (22/01/2008 at 12:46)
Can we just stick to the facts as they have been presented to date please?
Batfink, Manchester (22/01/2008 at 12:47)
Mark Spencer, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire. (22/01/2008 at 13:10)
Munkey, If only we knew what they were!
Ann the solicitor from Ashton no longer works in Manchester, the van driver from Rochdale has given up and gone back to modeling as has Ann from Ashton. The proposed charge at 5 quid "at todays prices" is last years news - what is it at TODAY's price 5.50? 6 quid? 7 pounds?
Chris, Irlam (22/01/2008 at 13:13)
Open it up and look at the grey area (quite apt!) on the large map labelled 'Possible future charging schemes' - this covers THE WHOLE of Greater Manchester and if you have been keeping up to date with this TIF bid since it was first mooted you will know that none other than Jolly Roger Jones has spoken of future charging schemes on this very website.
A few pertinent quotes:
"Phase 2 will entail capturing another 1.5 million people within the orbit of the transport diktat ... covering Wigan, Leigh, Bury, Bolton, Rochdale, Oldham, Denton, Ashton under Lyne, Stockport, Wilmslow and Altrincham."
"Planners have revealed that they will embrace continuous satellite tracking for all vehicles, when the technology becomes available. At a stroke they will ditch the vehicle tag and beacon regime which they are now proposing to introduce at great expense."
Peter Jones (22/01/2008 at 13:17)
Kiwi-blue, Christchurch NZ (22/01/2008 at 13:35)
Munkey Boy, Audenshaw, Manchester (22/01/2008 at 13:52)
The facts presented to date outline a 2-cordon charge in the morning peak inbound to Manchester and the reverse in the evening with the charge at £5 in today's prices (ie. in line with inflation) if you were to cross all four cordons.
Everything beyond that is hypothesis, speculation and rumour. FACT. Let's talk about what we know to date as opposed to trying to scare everyone into submission.
Munkey Boy, Audenshaw, Manchester (22/01/2008 at 14:12)
Alec (22/01/2008 at 14:31)
Martin Cohen (22/01/2008 at 15:06)
That is, make public transport attractive today. Reduce the fares, improve the service, make it comfortable, make it regular, efficient and make it safe.
Every time you hear the council cry for reduced road use by cars, the next day you hear tram fares are increased and bus fares increase as well. If our councillors REALLY want to show us what they can do, then act now. They should not apply for additional funding and tie the Manchester public into long term loans until they can prove to Manchester that the service they wish to offer, is offered.
Mark,Radcliffe. (22/01/2008 at 15:16)
alvinlwh (22/01/2008 at 15:20)
Chris, Irlam (22/01/2008 at 16:05)
Oh yes, this current LABOUR administration is VERY good with facts isn't it? Think Iraqi WMD dossier....
And it pays to look beyond what they show us (think the 'Chewbacca defence' on South Park) and look at the bigger picture - Phase 1 of this scheme is just the thin end of a very thick wedge.
FACT.
DANEBANKBLUE, DB (22/01/2008 at 16:31)
Bryan Neill (22/01/2008 at 16:38)
The reality is that most working people commute in their car as public transport is very unattractive, unsafe and totally impracticable. I find it inconceivable that the proposed congestion will be anything other than backhanded tax raising regime which will damage employees and businesses.
Munkey Boy, Audenshaw, Manchester (22/01/2008 at 17:22)
I really do think a huge proportion of the arguments against come from misinformation and cynicism, and every visit to this website compounds my fears.
This a reason why a referendum just wouldn't work, because people aren't commenting or discussing the facts presented to them. They seem to think everyone who turns the ignition to start their car is charged £5, which isn't even close to being the case.
How can we expect people to vote any differently?
James, Lancashire (22/01/2008 at 17:23)