Man Tai Tseung used to like a takeaway. In fact he used to like four a week. “Friday night was curry night,” he says.
“I’d have a curry on a Monday too because all the Chinese takeaways were closed.
“Then midweek I’d order a pizza online. The other nights I’d maybe eat out at a Chinese restaurant or go to a chip shop.”
This big appetite inevitably had big consequences. At his heaviest, Man Tai tipped the scales at 18st 10lbs. For someone who is 5ft 3ins tall he was clearly overweight.
His fondness for junk food was hardly surprising. He grew up in a Chinese chip shop and worked as a chef in the family business.
He spent his life surrounded by spare ribs and duck pancakes, and couldn’t help tucking in. “Testing the food was part of the job,” he remembers, ruefully.
When the 47-year-old from Bramhall, Stockport, became a high-flying business consultant, his diet didn’t change and his waistline continued to expand. When travelling on overseas trips he had to squeeze into aeroplane seats, struggling to buckle his seatbelt.
Then a year and a half ago all this changed. Man Tai became a new man. Today he is seven stone lighter thanks to a strict diet and fitness regime.
He managed to kick his taste for takeaways without town hall chiefs imposing a fat tax on his local chippy.
Oldham council is considering doing just that, introducing a levy on everything from kebab shops and fast-food outlets to tackle the ballooning problem of obesity.
Man Tai reckons it’s the wrong approach entirely.
“That’s not addressing the core problem,” he says. “Raising taxes in that way would tackle the symptoms but not the problem, which is people’s relationship with food.
“Maybe people wouldn’t buy takeaway food as often because the shops would put up prices. But the shops would also get rid of the more expensive food on their menus leaving the cheaper stuff.
“And that’s not good because generally the cheaper food is less healthy. So actually it could have a negative effect.”
Council insiders say the planned levy would be used to fund healthy-eating campaigns and litter-picking. They want to tackle the glut of fast-food shops which have sprung up across the borough.
And they hope it will address Oldham’s growing childhood obesity problem. Nearly one in five children aged 10-11 in the town are currently classed as obese, more than the regional and national average.
Health campaigners have backed the plans but Man Tai believes the council have got it wrong.
He says: “To lose weight you must change your lifestyle. It’s about coping with your environment, having regular meal times and breaking habits.
“I always had a curry on a Friday. You get into these habits and they are hard to break but it’s about changing your relationship with food.”
He’s not touched a takeaway on a Friday, or indeed any other day, for 18 months. The change came after he had a dawning realisation about the scale of his weight gain.
“Whether I was in denial or not I don’t know,” he says. “It basically crept up to such an extent that I didn’t really know I was actually fat.”
Deciding to fight the flab, he enrolled on the Lighter Life programme, a low-calorie meal replacement regime hat has attracted its fair share of controversy with experts saying the diet does not address the cause of obesity and only leads to short term success.
But Man Tai disagrees: “I used to eat even when I wasn’t hungry and the programme helped me recognise that.”
As a reformed takeaway addict who has dropped from a waistline of around 58ins to 34ins, he has some advice for council bosses who want to cut obesity, and it doesn’t involve taxing takeaway shops to fund healthy-eating campaigns.
“There needs to be much better systems across the healthcare professions to help people. Doctors, nurses, they all need to be in a position to offer advice on healthy eating.
“The core of the problem is our attitude to food. And people need direct help in understanding the importance of the choices they make.”
Other councils in Greater Manchester are said to be watching carefully the developments in Oldham. If the plans get the go-ahead there could be a tax raid on fast-food outlets across the region.
That wouldn’t affect Man Tai who says his days of feasting on fast-food four times a week are behind him.
“I’ve cut out takeaways but I still have meals in restaurants. The key is managing food not avoiding it.”
Tweet
Comments
Login or Register to comment
Well, this year I made the determined effort of looking at my weight. Being 6' 3" 21 1/2 stones at the start of january. I stopped taking biscuits and sweets and reduced my regular intake of food. In other words calorie counted for a month. Today I am 20 1/2 stone With no ill effects of craving. This is the crux stopping craving. I would like to reduce this to 18 stone but no pressure. And this is without doing any exercise just normal walking to papershop.
So according to this bloke to lose weight you need to eat healthily and sensibly , knock the take-aways on the head and do some excercise .
He also claims the pope is catholic and bears **** in the woods .
You cannot make this stuff up
It is the obese that need to be taxed not those who exploit the obese! Those who eat takeaways can just as easily buy junk food at a supermarket to avoid any such tax imposed via the takeaway proprietor.
You don't see many obese people in famine ridden countries. Want to get thinner, stop being so greedy.
It's all common sense, and all Oldham Council want to do is leech more off businesses and ultimately the customers. Man Tai is correct when he says the takeaways will protect their margins by buying cheaper and less healthier food - complete junk in other words. So the net result will be an actual worsening of the problems, and fatter Council coffers.
Councils know nothing about businesses, and only view them for what they can extract. I quote "Any business that doesn't pay its business rates doesn't deserve to be in business" That is the attitude applied irrespective of whether the business is making any money. I'll bet those businesses affected by the Metrolink works in Droylsden are getting no relief from paying their Rates even though their life-blood has been cut off.
So the levy is to be used to fund street cleaning and not obesity, seems a slight abuse of council powers really.