Home | Comment | Blogs

Blogs

Helen Tither: Stand together against 'nice guy' Dave's cuts

David Cameron always struck me as an unlikely kind of pin-up – less Men’s Health, more concerned with wealth.

But there must be something in that foppish quiff and wobbly bottom lip that I’m missing. Because he sure did a number on some of Manchester’s most vulnerable voters with his ‘just call me Dave’ charm.

On the day of last year’s General Election I was filming a documentary about childhood poverty in Moss Side. The family we were with had found themselves in a ‘there but for the grace of God’ situation. Just keeping their head above the loan-shark infested waters until – bam – the dad lost his business.

Never mind living on the breadline, the mum in this case was literally going without any food to keep her kids in hot meals.

Not exactly the place I expected to find devotees to Big Society Dave’s fan club. Yet it was there where I had some of my most electric election debates – as this woman who could not afford to clothe her children tried to persuade me of the benefits of voting blue.

Oblivious to the fact that they would probably cut the very services vital to her family’s survival, she justified her turn-around from Labour to Tory because “he just seems like such a nice guy”.

Unfortunately, this is one case where a smooth-talking man is leaving more in his wake than just broken hearts. When Cameron’s finished his hatchet job on Greater Manchester’s councils it will be broken lives we’re trying to fix.

This week the M.E.N. has backed the town hall’s fightback against some of the most catastrophically unfair cuts in our region’s history.

As nine out of 10 of Greater Manchester’s local authorities has their budgets slashed by more than the national average, this newspaper is encouraging everyone in the region to sign a petition opposing the cuts.

With Manchester alone facing a funding massacre of £110m, the reality of life in Tory Britain has landed firmly on our doorstep.

As 6,000 people across Greater Manchester face losing their jobs, any one of us could find ourselves in the same situation as that family we filmed in Moss Side.

Of course, it all comes down to blatant political bias.

Why else would Manchester’s Labour-run council face such crushing 21 per cent cuts, despite serving some of the most deprived areas in the country?

But playing party politics isn’t going to get us out of this mess. Which is why every Mancunian should be putting their name to the petition calling on the government to give back our missing millions.

Maybe you don’t work for a council, maybe you think it won’t affect you and your job. But it’s only a matter of time before the cuts cost jobs in related services across the region, never mind the loss of vital services.

Make no mistake, a cull like this won’t just have a ripple effect across the region – more like a tsunami we’re going to feel for years to come.

This city has got a fine political tradition of standing up for the most vulnerable in society and making ourselves heard.

We’re also a city that’s used to being split along down the middle between red and blue – usually in football terms. But whether we are City or United it’s always been Manchester that comes first.

Now’s the time for us to overlook our red or blue political colours in the same way and join together to support our city. Forget politics and sign the petition.

If you don’t, you’re not only letting the city’s most vulnerable people down – you could soon become one of them.

No light at the end of tunnel in football row

SO, basically, it’s offside if a player is nearer the goal than…ah, just teasing. I’m not really going to explain the offside rule for the millionth time since I wrote about it in last week’s column.

Like any woman who dared to comment on the whole sorry Sky shenanigans, I’ve been quizzed on it by blubbering blokes all week. Incredulous that I could possibly understand the Pythagoras-like complexities of such a ruling.

Well I can, get over it. News flash – football’s just not that complicated.

Anyway, seems there’s a new type of secret offside rule we didn’t know about. In the latest sexism scandal to besmirch the beautiful game, one of Manchester City’s female executives was banned from the players’ tunnel because she is a woman.

Vicky Kloss, chief communications officer at City, had only been trying to do her job and brief manager Roberto Mancini and players for post-match interviews at Notts County’s ground. Only to be stopped by a security guard in line with a policy that declares women offside if they dare to step into that inner sanctum.

“I thought I told you – no women allowed” was what he was overheard to say.

They might as well adopt that as a motto for the whole game.

Bra-vo – welcome to our world

SEEMS the true age of equality will be heralded in, not with the fanfare of trumpets or banging of drums, but with the jiggle of a ‘moob’.

For years we women have lived with the pressure to look perfect, with more and more girls going under the knife for that plastic fantastic look. So, praise be, it seems the tables are finally turning.

According to the latest figures from The British Association Of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, one of the biggest rises in surgical procedures is now for breast reduction among men.

Apparently, operations to scale back those ‘moobs’ have shot up by 28 per cent in the past year as men start to feel the fear of stripping off on the beach. Welcome to our world, boys.

Comments

Login or Register to comment

That was a party political broadcast on behalf of the champagne socialist party

Report This Reply View all 7 replies

It's the problem with politics, too much of it's form over substance.

However good GB's policies were did he have a chance against pretty boys Nick and Dave

Did baldy Hague or something of the night Howard have a chance against slick Tony?

Maybe if Labour had put someone other than a bald ginger against ginger Maggie she wouldn't have lasted so long.

But what (apart from taking people's votes away) can you do about it?

Report This Reply

But if a family whose business has just failed, which is surely the kind of situation a benefits system was set up to deal with "could not afford to clothe her children " and "was literally going without any food to keep her kids in hot meals".
And the council is "despite serving some of the most deprived areas in the country"

Then it would seem the current system is failing, and needs some kind of urgent reform.

Report This Reply

"David Cameron always struck me as an unlikely kind of pin-up"

yes, Gordan Brown is the apitamy of attractiveness and his pin up must look cracking on your wall Helen.

Report This Reply

The point is that the North West is having to cut back to the tune of £110 mill + which is way above any other area in the country (especially the south)!!. Worse times to come since Mrs Thatcher & i wonder if Argentina is due to be attacked ?.

Report This Reply

Bit like smarmy Tony Blairs false smile in '97.

Report This Reply View reply

Helen - I would like you to compare the govemnet cuts to the ones the MEN dished out a couple of years ago.....

Report This Reply

here endeth the lesson!!!
what helen tiher fails to metion is that if labour had been re-elected they would have had to make the same level of cuts in public spending.
this story is nonsense from start to finish.
typical champagne socilaist claptrap

Report This Reply View all 5 replies

the only thing this pro-Labour broadcast is missing is a rendition of "keep the red flag flying high"

Report This Reply

In these days of the easy scrounge I simply do not believe the Moss Side story you open with. Nobody starves in UK Charity Ltd.

Report This Reply

She was making a documentary about childhood poverty in Moss Side. Labour have run Manchester forever, we had a Labour government that chucked billions of (borrowed) money at every initiative under sun. Did it not occur to her to ask why there was still childhood poverty in Moss Side in 2010?

Report This Reply View reply

You may urge us to rid us of political bias but essentially this discussion is at the heart of political views.

Economic liberals belive that the state should only step in where there is market failure. The obvious example if street lighting etc. The planned economy types believe in more state direction and less individualism. The last national election gave the message to move away from a planned economy, the disaster that Gordon Brown created and a return to individual choice. In Manchester, when the local authority wanted to dictate our movements with the TIF plan, we gave it a big two fingers.

Let's reduce the size of local authorities, get them get back to concentrating on the basic support services. We do not want the local council to be playing at property management, property development, events promotion - proper companies can do this. Let the cuts give us liberty back.

Report This Reply

It is incredible that the MEN obviously supports the overpaid executives who are reponsible for the waste and overspending of tax payers money.

Report This Reply

Moob reduction ops are up 28 percent, from what, to what ? Easy to get a bit of free advertising this way.

Report This Reply

It's easy to target unpopular decisions like funding cuts and tax hikes, but you should really be griping about why they are being done. It's the over spending Labour government that has Britain in a mountain of debt.


There's 2 choices really. Pay off the debt, or go bankrupt and become a banana republic with massive inflation, massive unemployment and the country in chaos.

Thank Gordon Brown and remember that every time you bleat about cuts.

Report This Reply

It seems almost every respondent disagrees with Tither. It's nice to see M.E.N. being in touch with it's readers.

Report This Reply

Remember Derek Hatton ?
Runs a foreign property company now.

Get real. THERE IS NO MONEY !

Report This Reply View reply

Working class tories are either thick or mad.

Report This Reply View all 6 replies