A CORONER has blamed the toxic effects of cannabis for the sudden death of a 17-year-old trainee chef.
Hadrian Thomas Gardner – known as Adie – fell outside a Prestbury restaurant where he worked, on the evening of October 7, 2008, and died later in hospital, an inquest heard.
Hadrian, of Crompton Road, Macclesfield, led a "turbulent" life taking drugs and was expelled from Henbury High School, the coroner was told.
He had already suffered a heart attack the year before his death, but had taken a "big step forward" taking a trainee chef’s job at Prestbury Village Restaurant, the coroner said. He died after his second day at work.
Deputy coroner for Cheshire, Geoff Roberts, told Hadrian’s family and friends: "People use cannabis and think that it is a harmless property. We have heard clear evidence in this case that it is not. Very sadly, Hadrian died as a result of the direct toxic effects on the heart that the use of cannabis had. As such, it was an avoidable death."
Robert Gardner, Hadrian’s dad, told the inquest at Macclesfield Town Hall that he was waiting to pick up his son from The Village Restaurant, when the incident happened.
Mr Gardner said: "He came out of the restaurant, crossed the triangular piece of grass and then stumbled and fell on the pavement. It was a bit surreal. He fitted for about ten seconds."
Paramedics rushed to the scene, and despite resuscitation and six electric shocks to start his heart, Hadrian never recovered, the inquest heard. He died at Macclesfield Hospital at 12.15am on October 8.
Dr Mark Nicol, who treated the teenager at Macclesfield Accident and Emergency unit, said in his report that the case was "unique" as he had been admitted to A and E in 2007 after suffering a heart attack. On that occasion, doctors were able to revive him.
"Drug problems were acknowledged at that time", Dr Nicol added.
"This case highlights that cannabis use is potentially life threatening."
Mr Roberts added: "We have heard how over a period of time, for some years, he had used cannabis and perhaps other illegal substances.
"This is a very sad case because, despite his turbulent past and cannabis use, he had got a job as a trainee chef. The post-mortem showed no findings of recent drug use. But his body was left a legacy of using cannabis in the past, which directly led to his death.
"My conclusion is that Hadrian died as a result of using drugs."
Dr Sally Hales, who carried out the post mortem, said in a report to the coroner there were no traces of cannabis or other illegal drugs in Hadrian’s body when he died. Dr Hales examined the heart and concluded the teenager had myocarditis (inflammation of the heart) and that "a history of using cannabis, amphetamines and cocaine would appear to be the most likely cause".
Afterwards, Hadrian’s former boss at the Prestbury Village Restaurant paid tribute to him.
Manager Rick Palmer, a dad of two who runs the restaurant with wife Helen, said: "He was a nice lad who worked hard. He was reliable, no trouble and good to work with. His death was a total shock to us all."

Showing comments 1 to 9 and replies | View All
MaccForum.co.uk, (02/07/2009 at 02:52)
The physician who did the post-mortem said that "a history of using cannabis, amphetamines and cocaine would appear to be the most likely cause" of death.
Is the coroner being disingenuous here? Why focus only on cannabis? Why not mention the amphetamine and cocaine use that the post-mortem also revealed?
PeteF (02/07/2009 at 18:35)
MaryJane Cannabian (03/07/2009 at 06:04)
This Deputy Coroner should be fired - if he demonstrates this much incompetence to the the public, imagine all of the other mistakes he could be making behind closed lab doors.
How inept and outright ridiculous to declare Cannabis as the Cause of Death when there are so many other factors that probably contributed to his death first. Cocaine? Meth? Amphetamines? Possibly Tobacco and Alcohol? And a previous Heart Attack? Maybe even the fall he took? I'm not a Dr. but it is more than likely that it was one or a combination of those things that were contributors and/or possible causes of his death.
I suggest your paper give the Coroner this American DEA Study to read:
The Young Decision: excerpts from Drug Enforcement Agency Administrative Law Judge Francis Young (it's in regard of Medical Cannabis but this relates directly to the low toxicity of the Cannabis plant)
VIII: Cannabis/Marijuana's Accepted Safety for Use Under Medical Supervision
3. The most obvious concern when dealing with drug safety is the possibility of lethal effects. Can the drug cause death?
4. Nearly all medicines have toxic, potentially lethal effects. But marijuana (cannabis) is not such a sub-stance. There is no record in the extensive medical literature describing a proven, documented cannabis-induced fatality.
5. This is a remarkable statement. First, the record on cannabis encompasses 5,000 years of human experience. Second, cannabis is now used daily by enormous numbers of people throughout the world. Estimates suggest that 20-million to 50-million Americans routinely, albeit illegally, smoke marijuana without the benefit of direct medical supervision. Yet, despite this long history of use and the extraordinarily high numbers of social smokers, there are simply no credible medical reports to suggest that consuming cannabis has caused a single death.
6. By contrast aspirin, a commonly used, over-the-counter medicine, causes hundreds of deaths each year.
7. Drugs in medicine are routinely given what is called an LD-50. The LD-50 rating indicates at what dosage fifty percent of test animals receiving a drug will die as a result of drug induced toxicity. A number of researchers have attempted to determine cannabis's LD-50 rating in test animal, without success. Simply stated, researchers have been unable to give animals enough cannabis to induce death.
8. At present it is estimated that cannabis's LD-50 is around 1:20,000 or 1:40,000. In layman terms this means that in order to induce death a marijuana smoker would have to consume 20,000 to 40,000 time as much cannabis as is contained in one marijuana cigarette. NIDA-supplied marijuana cigarettes weigh approxi-mately .9 grams. A smoker would theoretically have to consume nearly 1,500 pounds of cannabis within about 15 minutes to induce a lethal response.
9. In practical terms, cannabis cannot induce a lethal response as a result of drug-related toxicity.
10. Another common medical way to determine drug safety is called the therapeutic ratio. This ratio de-fines the difference between a therapeutically effective dose and a dose capable of inducing adverse effects.
11. A commonly used over-the-counter product like aspirin has a therapeutic ratio of around 1:20. Two aspirins are the recommended dose for adult patients. Twenty times this dose, forty aspirins, may cause a lethal reaction in some patients, and will almost certainly cause gross injury to the digestive system, including extensive internal bleeding.
12. The therapeutic ratio for prescribed drugs is commonly around 1:10 or lower. Valium, a commonly used prescriptive drug, may cause very serious biological damage if patients use 10 times the recommended dose.
13. There are, of course, prescriptive drugs which have much lower therapeutic ratios. Many of the drugs used to treat patients with cancer, glaucoma and multiple sclerosis are highly toxic. The therapeutic ratio of some of the drugs used in anti-neoplastic therapies, for example, are regarded as extremely toxic poisons with therapeutic ratios that may fall below 1:1.5. These drugs also have very low LD-50 ratios and can result in toxic, even lethal reactions, while being properly employed.
14. By contrast, marijuana's therapeutic ratio, like its LD-50, is impossible to quantify because it is so high.
15. In strict medical terms marijuana is far safer than many foods we commonly consume. For example, eating 10 raw potatoes can result in toxic response. By comparison, it is physically impossible to eat enough cannabis to induce death.
16. Marijuana, in its natural form, is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man. By any measure of rational analysis cannabis can be safely used with a supervised routine of medical care.
http://www.fcda.org/judge.young.htm
I hope Coroner Roberts pays special attention to #8 - "A smoker would theoretically have to consume nearly 1,500 pounds of cannabis within about 15 minutes to induce a lethal response." (Impossible to do!) & #6 - "Marijuana, in its natural form, is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man. (more on the effects of Cannabis here: http://www.fcda.org/tenthings.html
Momentum for re-legalizing Cannabis is gaining steam throughout the world - please be aware that this sort of blatant, deceitful Propaganda will be increasingly spewed by organizations who have a stake in continuing the failed War on Drugs (via the Main Stream Media) at increasingly breakneck speeds. A couple of weeks ago a British study was released that stated "Cannabis damages human DNA". But what wasn't in the press release was that the study wasn't even performed on human DNA, but "Calf Thymus". It was called out here: http://blog.norml.org/2009/06/17/fox-news-infected ...
IMO, Deputy Coroner Geoff Roberts has some 'splainin' to do. And he better do it quick - before Defense lawyers get a sniff of this story and start appealing the Cheshire Coroners Office findings in their clients (homicide) cases as this one is so obviously flawed and misleading.
Coroner Roberts, in choosing to "Blame Cannabis" before the other obvious contributing factors calls into question his knowledge, and therefore his qualifications and abilities as a Coroner.
I'm sure when his peers in his field read about his inquest "findings" they will laugh him out of his job.
MaccForum.co.uk, (03/07/2009 at 16:25)
That said - to Mary Jane Cannabian: I'm not sure that the coroner actually declared that cannabis was the *direct* cause of death - the report to the coroner said Mr. Gardner had myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart, leading, unfortunately, to the heart attack. So while the LD50 info you provided is certainly interesting, I don't see anything in the Macc Express report that implies that toxicity was a direct factor in this case.
However I would agree that the blame appears to be being placed solely on the shoulders of cannabis, for some reason that is not actually reflected in the post-mortem.
treacletown toryboy, treacletown (05/07/2009 at 03:35)
do you smoke or take cannabis regularly, and if so how much, and how long for, just an honest question, you seem to know so much on the subject, also what strenght in so far as the, THT content, just a name of the leaf or bud would suffice.
James Bong (06/07/2009 at 17:14)
Get politics and prohibitionism out of the Coroner's office!
The Satisfied Customer (07/07/2009 at 04:19)
slinkywizard, Macclesfield (07/07/2009 at 09:00)
Same reason I ditched it dude, the days of kit kats and giggles were long gone.
The Satisfied Customer (09/07/2009 at 23:45)