A coroner has urged a sweet manufacturer to change its labelling after a toddler choked to death on a lollipop.
The parents of Francis Dean, two, also called for action after an emotional inquest.
He was killed when the lolly, given as an after-dinner treat, became lodged in his throat despite frantic attempts to save him.
Dad David Dean was on the balcony of his Beswick apartment with a friend when disaster struck last November.
Fighting back tears he told the hearing: "Michael (Francis's 13-year-old brother) was banging on the patio door. I looked inside and could see there was a massive problem. He had got the stick out but not the lolly.
"I put Francis on his back and tried to get the lolly out with my finger. I could feel it. But there wasn't enough room.
"I could feel it and I have to live with that. What we did was not enough."
Francis was put in a blanket and taken downstairs. But paramedics and doctors could not revive him.
The lolly had no warning printed on its cellophane wrapper. It came from an assortment bag which carried a warning on its reverse. It read: "Lollipops are a potential choking hazard. Not suitable for children under 36 months."
But Mr Dean, an NHS gym instructor, said that is not enough.
He explained: "They told me they sell 40 million of those lollies. Even if this is a one-in-a-million thing that's 40 kids.
Warning
"The warning needs to be made bigger and it needs to be put on the front. It might have saved Francis, it might not have done, but something needs to be done."
After recording a verdict of accidental death, Deputy Coroner Jean Harkin said she would write to the High Peak firm Swizzels Matlow to ask them to increase the size of the warning.
She also said she would urge them to look at the way the 'Double' lollies are made after family friend Lee Richardson told the hearing he had bought a packet the day after the tragedy and found the lolly 'just came off the stick with no pressure'.
Mum Dawn Bennison, a manager for First Choice holidays, said: "I've also given a letter for the coroner to send to the company. I just hope they do something."
Andrew Matlow, communications director at Swizzels Matlow, said: "We await the letter from the coroner's court and will take any instruction into serious consideration."
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 12 and replies | View All
Dave (16/03/2010 at 08:16)
Frankie Balboa (16/03/2010 at 08:20)
Frankie Balboa (16/03/2010 at 08:20)
Mad Welsh Scotsman, Cadishead (16/03/2010 at 08:27)
I don't think it's appropriate to blame the manufacturers on this occasion.
Hands of Stone, Southside, Manchester UK (16/03/2010 at 09:53)
I have a 5yr old and a 15mth old and I am always getting the mick taken out of me for acting like an over-zealous health & safety officer. Fact is and it's not always convenient, but I will read every packet and label before I purchase, even when people say come on stop being daft etc, etc...
I would rather be ridiculed for my behaviour than to be going through what these poor people have to live with. GB
Mike S, Manchester (16/03/2010 at 09:56)
Terrible tragedy but I agree with the other comments.
Doobydoo, Worsley (16/03/2010 at 10:29)
I am now in my 40's but as a young child was never allowed a lollipop unless I was sitting quietly. I was not allowed Boiled sweets until I was over 5 and again was always required to sit quietly. The reason being that a friend of my parents had lost a child in similar circumstances to those reported in this story.
Very sad but nobody is to blame.
davefb, bolton (16/03/2010 at 10:30)
Perhaps the publicity will remind people that just because it's a sweet doesn't mean it is suitable for all ages of children.
CommonSense, Manchester (16/03/2010 at 10:38)
Blunt (16/03/2010 at 12:41)
Ian manchester, manchester (16/03/2010 at 13:36)
hjk (16/03/2010 at 14:08)