A MUM has escaped jail despite living the high life thanks to her boyfriend's £12m ‘crash for cash’ scam.
Ettorina Hay was handed a 12-month suspended prison sentence and ordered to carry out 300 hours unpaid work in the community.
The 29-year-old, of Kirkby Road, Bolton, who admitted money laundering, enjoyed a millionaire lifestyle thanks to the crimes committed by her boyfriend, Mohammed Patel.
He bought her a £15,000 Lincoln Navigator and a £15,000 Mercedes Kompressor.
Patel paid for her home to be furnished and gave her £1,000 a month spending money and her wardrobe was packed with designer clothes.
Earlier this year, Patel, 25, of Nottingham Drive, Bolton, was jailed for four-and-a-half years after he admitted conspiracy to defraud, seven counts of dangerous driving and three counts of driving while disqualified.
Duped
He duped innocent motorists by suddenly slamming on his brakes at roundabouts so cars would crash into the back of his car, nearly every day for three years.
He staged hundreds of collisions at the A34 Handforth bypass in Cheadle Hulme, outside the Trafford Centre and at Junction 10 on the M65 at Burnley.
After Patel was jailed, Judge Bernard Lever ordered a report into who would take care of Hay’s son if she was jailed.
Manchester Crown Court heard the alternatives would have been either for the boy to join his father, who he sees rarely, or be taken into care.
The court also heard Hay was being sentenced for fraud totalling £25,000 although she faces a future court hearing under the Proceeds of Crime Act where it will be alleged she benefited by up to £46,000.
Sentencing Hay, Judge Lever told her: “If you were a single woman living on your own the likelihood is I would sentence you to 12 months in prison.
Factor
“I have to factor into my sentencing today that you have a child who hardly knows his father and he’s the only person who can look after the child or the child will be taken into care for six months.”
He added: “I also very much take into account that you in no way tried to play on the difficulties of your child to avoid a prison sentence. This is my decision and I must take responsibility for it. It’s not a case of a mother playing the child card.”
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 22 and replies | View All
Mike S, Manchester (23/12/2009 at 14:24)
Persepolis Young (23/12/2009 at 14:30)
Laura Norder, Didsbury (23/12/2009 at 14:34)
Stevedore, Quayside (23/12/2009 at 14:40)
Knowledge Poverty, The Range (23/12/2009 at 14:43)
i'm not usually one for capitals but
TAKE THE CHILD AWAY FROM HER, GIVE THE CHILD A DECENT HOME AND FAMILY
AND THROW THAT WOMAN IN JAIL!!!!!!
NWmancCUB (23/12/2009 at 15:20)
PCW, manchester (23/12/2009 at 15:39)
Squire of Newton, Newton nr. Hyde (23/12/2009 at 16:10)
This sentance is so pathetic its just laughable.
C.Mababejive (23/12/2009 at 16:48)
1) To blag benefits and new housing from the state
2)To ensure that you dont have to go out and earn a living
3) to badge it with some syndrome or other to get more benefits
4) to ensure you dont get locked away when that is clearly what you deserve
5)And to use as a weapon when you have tired of your husband/partner and decide to throw him out and drain him of all his assets.
moaning bugger, reddish (23/12/2009 at 17:02)
Ivor Rash, Oldham (23/12/2009 at 18:22)
Just Wondering?, North Manchester (23/12/2009 at 20:03)
Hamish Macbeth, Whitefield (24/12/2009 at 08:09)
A mate of mine refers to such children as "Bargaining Chips". For some reason though in this age of equality such "chips" can only be held by women
Simishine, Manchester (24/12/2009 at 11:43)
charlie chan number 1 son, Hollywood (24/12/2009 at 12:50)
blizzard, derbyshire (26/12/2009 at 08:26)
jeffb, buxton (26/12/2009 at 12:37)
Redberry, Manchester (28/12/2009 at 17:53)
Having travelled abroad many times the perception in other countries is that the UK is a soft touch with gangs of criminals running riot with no regard for the police and courts. They also have the idea that many criminals from abroad have entered the UK by any means possible to jump on the " crime pays culture" that exist here. How right they are.
michael boyd (29/12/2009 at 15:27)
Local lad, outsidethebox (29/12/2009 at 16:05)
salfordrat (30/12/2009 at 10:34)
Redberry, Manchester
Playing devils advocate here but.....did you actually read the story? The judge said that at no time had she tried to play on the fact that she had a child to avoid a custodial sentence. And how can you use your children to avoid jail? Are you suggesting that people think - I will have a child so that ne day in the future I can break the law and have less chance of getting sent down?
joe bloggs (27/01/2010 at 13:36)